# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1975_S468 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) GUIDING PRINCIPLES GUIDING PRINCIPLES For the Use of A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles With Special Reference to the Expression of Dissent A Report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod November 1973 +) To determine of the Gssent in ANY Way invaives disagreement the Seriptures and the Lutheran Confessions Bo After the commission has given full consideration to these com- Munteat ons. it shall proweed as tollows lof someussion i perscaded that the criticism er dissent ts IMerror at sr communicate this to the individual, and. where Necessary. to the respective otficrals tever further aetion May he necessary, 2oTt sriticism or dissent cs found ty be vaiid. the CICR will atiompt ato Sherdiy the issue for the Synod, bo te recommend tu th Ssnod changes or appropnate acnen for ah Port to the church semumisson's Bupe that ts “Guiding Principles.” ay cael! as ats Subsequent consideration of obyecuons to such ssnodicui doctringi statements as 4 Starement. will assist the Synod in the senservation and promotion of the unity of the true faith” ¢Constituuen, Article HL) 2 The commission will make an appropriate MUIETIONE oApresses Dk RALPH A BOHT MANS, Eaecutie Secretary COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS The Lutheran Church» Missouri Synod November 1473 Preface In its 1973 synodical convention The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod adopted 4 Statement of S npteral and Contesyional Principles as a formal “statement of belief” (Resolution 3-01, Proceedings pp t27—~-1281 While many have greeted this action with enthusiasm, others have disagreed with it. Considerable discussion has taken Pluce in the Synod on the meaning of the convention's action. av we'l as on the means that ure available to the members of the Synod for the expression of dissent The “Guiding Principles” that follow were Prepared to help the members of the Synod understand how the Synod uself has spoken to such questions The imtial draft was Prepared at the request of President Prous and discussed with the Council of Presidents in July and September before its submission to the CTCR in September {973 for further con- sideration. After discussion and revision in tac meetings of the com- Mission, it Was formally adopted for distribution throughout the Synod In order te further the development of theological consensus in the Synod. President Preus hus asked the CTCR to provide leadership in Carrying Out its constitutional responsibilities ta dea! with stutements of dissent or objectons to the Synod’s doctrinal stetements In response to that request, the commission adopted the folowing “Policy for Processing Communications and Statements of Dissent”: The CTCR expresses its intention to listen carefully to ali who have objections to or misgivings about synodically adopted “statements of belief and of doctrinal resolutions. or who offer suggestions for their Improvement. The commission also seeks to Promote conversation with groups or individuals. where this is desirable and feasible, in an attempt to resolve doctrinal! differences und misunderstandings in accordance with the Scriptures und the Confessions. The commission implores the aid und blessing of the Holy Spirit that these endeavors May instruct and edify Christ's holy people A. The rete of the commasion in carrying out this responsibility shall be: 1. To receive and consider all communications and statements of dissent with regard to synodicully adopted “stiutements of be- het” and doctrinal resotutions: 2. To classify all these communications and determine the nature of any dissent 3. To weigh all eriticnms or suggestions regarding synodically adopred “statements of bellef” and or doctrinal resolutions: GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE USE OF A STATEMENT OF SCRIPTURAL AND CONFESSIONAL PRINCIPLES WITH SPECIAL REFFRENCE TO THE EXPRESSION OF DISSENT Introduction The 1973 convention of the LOMS declared 4 Statement or Scrips ferdl and Cormtessionul Princspies via he Senpteral and in accord sith the Coutheran Confessions, and therefore « formu ooaowhich derves its au- monty from the Werd of God and which expresses the Synod’s position oo current doc: “IY S Resolution 211. Proceedines, p. 12805 y The convention : eecuring it to be a omore torr in the sense of Reseluuon &.24 Maung that d Starement * } (1972 Resolution 3-U!, Pron eed: meive statement of belief kee convention.” and the status defined in said resolution” p. 12s) vether in the Ssood that we de net give our synodiy. adopted dovtr: statements “more or less status than Chey deserve” 61964 Resolution 2-27 Proceedings. p Yt1. Our Synod has spoken on this question a number of times in its recent history.- The guiding principles that follow summarize and “Ppply what the Syed has said about the status und use of it. doctrinal stat ents in general and ofa synodicul “statement of beef” isuch asf Statement ot Scriptural and Comessional Peneiples in Particular ft is hoped that these Principles sil help the Synod tind a greater measure of unity in tts confession of faith and witness to the world His mpertent for our lifes Guiding Principles 1 Because of the action of the 1973 synodical convention. A Statement of Scriptura: and Contesstonal Prnciples is now te be regarded as an oficial synodical document which is to be used throughout the Synod rather than as the statement of an individual intended for a somewhat Inmited use As a svnoheal document, 4 § fement “expresses the Synod’s position on current doctrinal issues” 1 1973 Resolution 3-01, Proceedings, p. 12%). More Precisely. 4 Stasement has the status of being a synodicel “statement of belief” in the seme of 1971 Resolu- tion S-24.4 = The doctrina! authority of 4 Srarement is not derived from the ma- jority vote of the 1973 synodical convention, but “from the Word of God” which it sets forth “from Holy Scripture” (1971 Resolution 8-24. cf. 1973 Resolution 3-01, First Resolved, Proceedings. p. 12) Such synodical statements of belief. “insofar as they are in accord A