# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1975_S436 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 436 inspiration, (c) deny the unity of Scripture, and {d) dilute the principle of Sola Scriptura; and Wuereas, The CTCR has recommended to the Synod that any method which tends to deny the divine charac- ter and authority of Scripture be rejected and repudi- ated by the Synod; therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod concur in the general judgment of the CTCR with regard to the Historical Critical Method (cf. CW, p. 30): and be it further Resolved, That the Synod repudiate the use of the Historical Critical Method. or any other method which operates with the same presuppositions and procedures, and so direct that it not be employed at its colleges and seminaries in the task of interpreting the Scriptures; and be it finally Resolved, That the Synod beseech its pastors, teach- ers, and congregations to exercise great care and vigi- lance in carrying out their responsibilities in the area of Biblical interpretation and instruction, to the end that throughout our Synod only such principles of Biblical interpretation shall be employed as are in harmony with historic Lutheran doctrine regarding the authority of the canonical text, the inspiration and the unity of Scripture, and the principle of Sola Scriptura. To Continue Evaluation of the Synod's Membership and Participation in LCUSA RESOLUTION 2-39 Overtures 2-04, 2-05, 2-115A through 2-121 (CW, pp. 47 —48, 80—82) The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod joined LCUSA asa result of convention action in 1965 (Resolu- tion 3-12, 1965 Proceedings, p.110) with the intention of establishing a forum enabling Lutheran church bodies, “to seek to achieve theological consensus in a systematic and continuing way on the basis of Scrip- tures and the witness of the Lutheran Confessions” (LCUSA Constitution, Article IV) and also to become an agency through which the Synod might carry out joint Lutheran activities consistent with our fellowship principles. Inter-Lutheran participation within the structured agency of LCUSA has received both com- mendation and criticism. Resolution 3-18 of the 197) synodical convention (1971 Proceedings, pp. 133134) directed the President of the Synod “to petition the proper persons or boards of LCUSA to institute an in- dependent and objective study of all its operations,” particularly the need for the various divisions of LCUSA, the policies, fiscal programs and procedures. The Board of Directors has reported on the results of this study to date (CW, p. 47 f.). The Milwaukee resolu- tion also made the President of the Synod “responsible for study and evaluation of the Division of Theological Studies of LCUSA ... to determine the extent to which Synod’s participation in LCUSA is achieving or hin- dering the promotion of unity in doctrine and practice: and that the findings and recommendations be reported to the Council of Presidents and to the next convention of the Synod.” This study has not been completed. Resolution 3-18 of the 1971 synodical convention also authorized the Board of Directors “to determine on the basis of need, the program and services of which the Synod should avail itself and for which it will allocate funds.” Wuereas, The cost of the Synod's partcipation in LCUSA (which was $742,000 in the 1972—73 fiscal year) has been the cause of considerable concern within the Synod; and Wuereas, The Synod's Board of Directors is of the opinion “that at the present moment in history the Synod may well regard its participation in LCUSA as primarily an investment in inter-Lutheran relation- ships” (CW, p. 48); therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod continue membership in LCUSA on a selected program basis in an effort to achieve its original objec- tives of membership; and be it further Resolved, That the Synod request the Council to in- tensify its efforts to “seek to achieve theological con- sensus in a systematic and continuing way on the basis of Scripture and the witness of the Lutheran Confes- sions’; and be it further Resolved, That the Synod’s Board of Directors and through them all boards and commissions be directed to keep the programs and activities in the Council under REFERRED RESOLUTIONS continuing scrutiny in order to determine those pro- grams in which the Synod should participate. basing their judgment on such criteria as the effect on the Synod’s doctrinal position. compatability with the Synod's fellowship principles, economic feasibility, and contribution to the achievement of the objectives of the Council: and be it further Resolved, That the synodical Board of Directors, after consultation with the Commission on Theology and Church Relations, attempt to effect a substantial reduc- tion in the cost of the Synod's involvement in the Coun- cil by withdrawing from any activities, departments, offices. or divisions of the Council (with the exception of the Division of Theological Studies) where this is deemed advisable on the basis of the above criteria: and be it finally Resolved, That the study of the Lutheran Council requested in 1971 Resolution 3-18 be completed at a very early date, and that the findings be reported to the Synod prior to the 1975 synodical convention. To Urge Lutheran Church — Canada to Determine Its Goals for Lutheran Unity RESOLUTION 2-41 Reports 2-01, U, A and 4-07, C; Overture 2-159A—C (CW, pp. 33, 181, 93) Wuerezas, The Synod has encouraged Lutheran Church — Canada to pursue the course of Lutheran unity in Canada (Proceedings, 1971, Res. 3-09); and Wuergas, The President of the Synod requested LC-C to respond to the invitation of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada “to enter into official nego- tiations to bring about a merger of the Canadian consti- tuencies of the LCMS and the ELCC”: and Wuereas, LC-C in its report to this convention (CW, pp. 181—182) submits the resolution of response adopted at the convention of the LC-C, February 16—18, 1973; and Wuereas, There are disparate opinions among the Districts as to the best course to follow regarding Lu- theran unity to carry out Christ's mission in Canada more effectively; and Whereas, It is desirable that the Synod's Canadian constituency speak as nearly as possible with one voice on the matter of the goal, shape, and scope of Lutheran unity in Canada and how they deem best to achieve it: therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod call upon the constituents of the LCMS in Canada to set forth the goal. shape, and scope of the type of unity they seek in Canada and how they think they can best achieve them: and be it further Resolved, That this be done in consultation with the CTCR and reported to the next LCMS convention: and be it further Resolved, That the resolution of response to the in- vitation of the ELCC adopted by the Lutheran Church — Canada (CW. p. 181) not be implemented (with the exception of the provision for doctrinal discussion) until the above provisions have been satisfied: and be it finally Resolved. That we pray that God will bless the ef- forts of the Lutheran Church — Canada to carry out Christ's mission in Canada. To Recognize Concerns Regarding Mission:Life Materials RESOLUTION 2-42 Overtures 2-89, 2-90, 2-91 (CW, pp. 73—74) Wuereas. The Mission: Life materials are intended to provide parishes of the Synod with effective tools for Christian education; and Wuereas, The Board of Parish Education has assured the Synod of careful attention to sound doctrine in de- velopment. writing, and publishing of Mission: Life ma- terials: and WHEREAS, Members of the Synod continue to register concern over the doctrinal content of Mission: Life cur- riculum materials; therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod direct Mission: Life editors and writers to give faithful and adequate expression of sound Lutheran doctrine in preparation of materials to be used in parishes of the Synod: and be it further Resolved, That the President of the Synod together with the Board of Doctrinal Review be encouraged to make every effort to insure careful and painstaking doc- trinal review of Mission: Life materials (Handbook. XI, B. 1 and 11.151): and be it further Resolved, That the Synod reaffirm Milwaukee Reso- lution 7-20 (1971 Proceedings. p. 184) which encourages congregations “to evaluate Mission: Life materials, and to report their evaluations to the Board of Doctrinal Review and the Board of Parish Education’: and be it further Resolved, That the Synod reaffirm Milwaukee Reso- lution 7-20 which states in part: “that congregations be encouraged to send all evaluations of Mission: Life ma- terials to the Board of Doctrinal Review and Board of Parish Education for consideration” and “that the Synod remind every congregation of its responsibility to evalu- ate critically all the materials used in its educational program in order that they be soundly Scriptural and that the saving Gospel of Jesus Christ predominate”: and be it finally Resolved, That congregations of the Synod continue to implore the guidance of the Holy Spirit (in behalf of) all those responsible for producing curriculum materials and related teaching aids for Christian education. To Decline Overture 2-88 RESOLUTION 2-43 Overture 2-88 (CW. p.73) Wuereas, The Synod has provided for orderly calling of candidates for the pastoral and teaching offices (Handbook, 4.11, 4.09, 4.15): and Wuereas. The Synod has provided for the orderly doctrinal supervision of all the pastors and teachers (Handbook, p. 20, Art. XI B, 1-3. p. 22, Art. XII. 6—8); therefore be it Resolved. That the Synod decline Overture 2-88 (CW. p. 72): and be it also Resolved, That the membership of the Synod urge the President, the District presidents. and the circuit counselors to exercise doctrinal supervision. pledging them support and cooperation in this exercise. To Refer Request to Study Lay Diaconate RESOLUTION 2-44 Overture 2-95 (CW. p. 75) Wuereas. A brief statement concerning “The Nature and Function of the Diaconate in the Lutheran Church” (CW. p. 464) was included in the CTCR report. "The Ministry and Its Relation to the Christian Church": and Wuereas, The words “Lay Diaconate” are a new term; therefore be it Resolved, That the maker of Overture 2-95 submit to the CTCR a more definitive description of the “Lay Diaconate” for evaluation and recommendation. To Continue Ecumenical Dialogs RESOLUTION 2-45 Report 2-01, II; Overtures 2-164, 2-169 (CW, pp. 36, 94 to 95) Wuerras, The CTCR has recommended “that the Synod encourage its members to continue their interest and participation in all ecumenical dialogs”: therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod acknowledge with thanks- giving to God the blessings reached thus far in both the Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogs, as well as the dialogs with other bodies in the Christian world; and be it further Resolved, That the Synod continue to participate on every level in ecumenical dialogs that permit a clear witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ as set forth in the Holy Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions. To Affirm the Inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures RESOLUTION 2.46 Overtures 2-78A—B, 2-79, 2-80 (CW, p.70) Wuereas, The Synod has repeatedly affirmed the in- spiration and inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures, the source and norm of all theology: therefore be it