# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1975_S204 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 204 CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS The commission suggested to the Commission on Theology and Church Relations that our Synod needs clear theological definitions of such constitutional terms as “heterodox,” “union- ism,” “syncretism,” ete. (Article VI), and a clear statement of what should be the Synod's relationship to other Christian church bodies. It reviewed the proposed Bylaws for the Board for Evange- lism. It also reviewed, evaluated, and made suggestions for changes in the following District Bylaws and or Articles of In- corporation: Texas, Northwest, New England, South Wisconsin, Northern Illinois, Montana, Manitoba-Saskatchewan. The commission was represented in the meetings of the so- called “Committee of 20." The commission suggested that the Council of Presidents recommend through proper channels a specific and simplified appeals procedure regarding roster cases for consideration by the 1975 convention. III. Opinions and Interpretations In addition to the items referred to in sections II and IV, Opinions, rulings, or interpretations were also given on many other questions, among them the following: On the status of a delegate who moves to another Circuit or District On the beginning date of newly elected board members On the faculty status of an institutional president On procedures to be followed in a discipline case after governing Bylaws have been changed On the terms under which an LCMS pastor may accept a call to an LCA congregation On the ineligibility of an emeritus pastor to serve as a lay dele- gate On the retirement policies adopted by the Board of Directors for synodical staff personnel On the right of Districts to adopt limited tenure rules On the realignment of Circuits On the nomination of Counselors On the question of whether an emeritus pastor can serve as a Circuit Counselor On the relationship between Sections V and VI of the Hand- book with respect to the bringing of charges against faculty members That public school teachers who are still on the teacher roster of the Synod may not serve as lay delegates That only official District conferences may submit overtures to a District convention That Resolution 3-09 does not condemn an individual faculty member but a doctrinal position That boycotting faculty cannot Participate in the certification and placement of seminary graduates That boycotting students cannot be certified for the holy ministry either by the boycotting element or by the synodical element of the faculty That individual District Presidents or a group of Presidents do not have the authority to assign students to a congregation or enter such students on the clergy roster of the Synod That certification for ordination and installation within the Synod cannot be made by an ALC, LCA, or Episcopal seminary or governing body That under the new Bylaw adopted in New Orleans simple status calls are no longer proper That a District President may remove an individual at any time from the roster but after 3 years of ¢.r.m. status the District President cannot retain an individual without action of the entire Council of Presidents That the Council of Presidents does not have the authority to clarify or to interpret the Bylaws That the rules of procedure in Bylaw 5.31 apply also when the Board of Control takes the place of a Commission of Adjudi- cation (6.79) That member congregations must call pastors who are certified by the Synod if they wish to retain their membership in the Synod On the involvement of the BHE in the supervision of vicars On the bearing of Article VII on mixed marriage services On the placement of graduates of the Saskatoon seminary On the possibility of a worker-priest serving as a pastoral dele- gate to a District convention On the constitutionality of the action of the Council of Presidents in placing Seminex vicars On the synodical membership status of an unordained instructor at a seminary On the eligibility of a delegate from a congregation which is withholding funds On the proper interpretation and application of Bylaw 1.27 ¢ On the question of double Jeopardy On the implementation of resolutions by the synodical and District Presidents On the basic relationship between the Synod and the Districts On the constitutionality of the President's 1973 convention report On the publication and release of A Statement On the right to appeal a decision of a Board of Control to the convention On the interpretation of New Orleans Res. 5-27 regarding the election of delegates On District procedures for nominating and electing a President and Vice-Presidents On the status of former faculty members on various boards On the authority of the Commission on Worship in the produc- tion of a new lectionary and worship book On the eligibility of women to serve on a congregational board of directors On the question of whether a congregation can call a man to serve as a professor at a theological institution or to serve as an assistant pastor at a distance On the Council of Presidents’ resolution regarding the inter- viewing and subsequent certification of Seminex graduates On the disciplinary jurisdiction of a “student in exile” On the question of whether a pastor who has accepted a call may continue as a delegate representing his former consti- tuency On the constitutionality of New Orleans Res. 2-12, 3-01, and 3-09 On the use of A Statement as a test of orthodoxy On a District executive's tenure and relationship to his Board of Directors On joint campus ministries On Seminex graduates serving in a pastoral way without a call On the meaning of “in such a case” in Bylaw 6.79 d On the eligibility of called faculty members to serve ona faculty committee On several District resolutions regarding the placement of Seminex graduates On disciplining congregations and individuals involved in im- proper ordinations On the rights of a District convention floor committee On the possibility of a pastor serving congregations of another Lutheran church body On the obligation of the Board of Directors and all other boards and officers to carry out the resolutions of the Synod On the San Francisco Night Ministry That a District Board of Directors has neither the right to set aside a resolution of the Synod (Bylaw 3.07 a) nor the right to interpret the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the Synod (Bylaw 2.107 e) That a teacher who refuses to sign the Constitution cannot be a member of the Synod That a congregation or individual cannot belong to two church bodies at one and the same time That a parochial school association is not qualified to recognize a theological institution on behalf of the Synod That ordinations of uncertified persons are unconstitutional even if they are referred to by other names such as investi- tures, commissionings, appointments, etc. That a member of a congregation not yet in membership with the Synod cannot serve as a lay delegate to a synodical convention On the question of a roll-back of actions On the special session of the Atlantic District convention