# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1941_S436 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 436 Two Radio Addresses ambassadors who have gone into many countries to project against the sky-line the spires of churches built solely and only by a, strict adherence to the Scriptures. One of the features of this program was the simultaneous singing in twelve different lan- guages of the great Lutheran hymn “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God.” Issued by the Synodical Press Committee Ap. F. Meyer, Chairman Wo. F. Bruenine, Secretary J. F.E. Nicketspure, Treasurer II Blue Network, June 26, 1941, National Broadcasting Co. This is Walter Van Kirk reporting on the Fort Wayne Con- vention of the Evangelical Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. Once again the delegates are assembled in the Gymnasium of Concordia College in order to listen to this broadcast. And . once again I desire to extend to the Convention the greetings of the National Broadcasting Company. Luther once said, “Who has the youth has the future.” The truth of this has been amply demonstrated, and often painfully demonstrated, in recent years. And these spiritual descendants of Luther are resolved that the youth of America shall not be mobilized by forces hostile to the Christian faith, A number of resolutions have been adopted here designed to strenghten and broaden the Lutheran program of Christian education. Under the direction of the Christian Board of Education the Missouri Synod is instructed not only to maintain existing parochial schools for religious instruction but wherever possible to add to the number of these schools. It is recognized that, if the young people of America are weaned away from the Church, the future of our nation will be dark indeed. For three days now I’ve been listening to the Convention debate the question of unity among Lutherans. Differences among Lutherans have to do with both doctrine and practice und the meeting of confessional loyalty. But there can be no doubt that the Missouri Synod eagerly and, I might add, unanimously desires to achieve a closer union among Lutherans generally, but more particularly, at this stage, with the American Lutheran Church. As a matter of fact no fewer thon 65 memorials from large anc representative conferences were laid before the Convention urging the Synod to continue its efforts looking toward unity. And by unity I mean doctrinal unity as a first step, and after that perhaps organic union. The Missouri Synod is very clear in its own mind that whatever is done in bridging the chasm of disunity among Lutherans must be done strictly in keeping with Christ’s prin- f