# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1941_S279 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Intersynodical and Doctrinal Matters 279 American Lutheran Church on the doctrine of inspiration, ¢ the United Lutheran Church of America commission had itely refused. to endorse what our Brief Statement says on subject. The question was, How could the American Lutheran “hurch commission accept our position and at the same time itself in harmony with the United Lutheran Church of America mrmissioners? In response to an invitation two members of the American Lutheran Church commission came to St.Louis for a conference. They declared: In their view the United Lutheran hurch of America commission had receded from its opposition to verbal inspiration as taught in the Brief Statement and had accepted -. the Biblical doctrine. We on our part found the Pittsburgh Agree- ment not adequate because it contains loopholes for a denial of ‘the verbal inspiration and inerrancy of the Scriptures. Attitude of Other Synodical Conference Synods 7. In the mean time we held several meetings with repre- sentatives of our sister synods in the Synodical Conference and found that the brethren of the Wisconsin and the Norwegian Synod ’ considered the basis adopted in St. Louis, June, 1938, for the estab- lishment of fellowship between the American Lutheran Church and our body inadequate. Our Statement on Remaining Obstacles 8. At our last meeting with the commissioners of the American Lutheran Church, held March 26 and 27, 1940, they asked us for a formal statement enumerating the obstacles which in our view still hinder the establishment of fellowship between our two church- bodies —a statement which they might submit to their convention to be held in Detroit in October, 1940. We were glad to hand them such a statement. (For a full text of this statement see Concordia Theological Monthly for December, 1940.) 9. The obstacles which we enumerated may briefly be given as follows: a) The membership of the American Lutheran Church in the American Lutheran Conference, inasmuch as we cannot unite with the American Lutheran Church unless its sister synods in the American Lutheran Conference occupy the same position as the American Lutheran Church and the Missouri Synod; b) Our membership in the Synodical Conference, inasmuch as we cannot enter into fellowship with a church-body if our sister synods cannot share the new relationship; c) The points in the Sandusky Resolutions and the one sentence in the Declaration mentioned above;