# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1938_S302 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) eee eee eee eneaea ae amneaaenc ee eee OE LE NES 802 Financial Matters the payment of the apportionment is reliable in the form of an unconditional pledge. If the reply to our question is negative, we respectfully plead that the Hon. Synod instruct its Fiscal Conference to accept an honest District pledge of an annual contribution, paid monthly, in lieu of an arbitrary apportionment. Or what other advice would . the Hon. Synod offer besides the encouragement that the Southern f California District become more fruitful also financially? May God’s richest blessings rest upon the convention! Respectfully submitted, Boarp or DirEcTORS FIscaL CONFERENCE of the Southern California Finance CoMMITTEE District Apvisory CoMMITTEE per Wa ter F. Trorcer, Vice-President F. J. Scumnerer, Director Committee G. H. SmuKat, President G. H. Smukat, Chairman f Committee 14 reported: 7 One question involved in this overture is this. A District is b subsidized by Synod; it receives, let us say, $10,000. Though the District receives a subsidy from Synod, it is expected to contribute something to Synod’s treasury; the amount is determined by the Fiscal Conference. Now, if a District which receives as a subsidy $10,000 is asked by the Fiscal Conference to contribute to Synod’s budget the sum of $10,000, would it not be just as well for the District to become independent? This would mean that the Dis- — trict does not get any subsidy from Synod and does not contribute toward Synod. aye Your Committee is of the opinion that Synod advise sub- sidized Districts by adopting the following resolution: Resolved, That a subsidized District, as a rule, ought not to seek to become independent until it can do both, a) conduct its work without a subsidy and b) still continue to contribute its proportionate share to Synod. Another question involved in this memorial is this: Is it wise to increase the annual budget for the Southern California District since this District considers the amount apportioned to it by the Fiscal Conference as a sacred obligation and sends its contribution each month in full; or ought an honest pledge by the Southern California District to be accepted by the Fiscal Conference instead of an apportionment?