# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1938_S98 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 98 Action Regarding Individual Institutions in to fill the need. This lay leadership was (and is today) largely unprepared. In various centers, efforts were made to meet this condition. Within the last decade we notice a steady procession of institutes, correspondence courses, summer-conference camps, and now — extension courses in synodical institutions. Unfortunately these efforts are largely sporadic and unguided. With the proper synodical machinery such needs should be antici- pated, encouraged, and guided. It may be the prerogative of every local congregation to train Sunday-school teachers and leaders of young people’s organizations; but it is seriously to be questioned whether it is the part of wisdom to exercise this privilege as the only or even the most important means of training lay leaders. Even a superficial examination of conditions reveals a considerable amount of duplication, overlapping, and general dispersion of effort. At present our educational program lacks comprehensiveness of view, definition of function, coordination and guidance in its development. An educational policy suitable for the Church should embrace all its educational activities. The Board of Christian Edu- cation as now constituted centers its attention on the age of child- hood on the elementary-school level — not entirely but largely. Yet what confusion exists in that field! Agencies have multiplied to fill specific needs. We have for this age the day-school, the Sunday-school, the Saturday-school, the vacation Bible-school, the confirmation class, and some part-time week-day schools. The great problem of keeping the preschool child in direct contact with the Church is barely touched. On the youth level we have similar conditions. The Bible classes and the educational program of the Walther League are not usually coordinated but independent of each other. The educational program on the adult level is largely undeveloped and unexplored. All the areas mentioned ‘require Jeadership either on the part of the clergy or of the laymen. This fact has been recognized in practise. Synod has from its very beginning provided institutions, synodically controlled, to prepare teachers and preachers. In ad- dition to these specially prepared leaders there has grown lay leadership in all areas referred to. The Sunday-school elects a “cradle-roll secretary” who assists in the work of caring for the child of preschool age; Sunday-school teachers are called upon to teach religion almost without special preparation; untrained women teachers have been employed to teach religion in parochial schools; young people and adults are expected to take over the educational leadership in their organizations regardless of the special prepara- tion for this important work. In view of this situation efforts have been made in the past to give lay leaders an opportunity to prepare themselves for their work. But all that has been done in this direc-