# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S486 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) '-161 !-162 1-163 164 '-165A 1-166 1-167 1-168 1-169 1-170 '-171 1-172 1-173 1-174 1-175 s-01 S-O1A ‘-01B 3-01C t~01D -11A LIST OF REPORTS AND OVERTURES PAGE To Sever All Ties with National Council of Churches To Deny Petitions for Membership in World Council of Chur¢hes To Stay Out of World Council of Churches —_ Other Fellowship Matters To Acknowledge Blessings on Roman Catholic Dialogs To Initiate Action to Resume Fellowship with Wisconsin and Evangelical Lutheran Synods — (Also 2-165B) To Stress Cooperative Welfare Services —___ To Pursue Closer Relationship with Other Lu- theran Bodies To Celebrate and Express Unity of Faith To Seek Fellowship with Other Christians __ To Interpret Article VI 2 b Re Worship Fel- lowship To Stress “Publica Doctrina” lowship Efforts To Abolish Unconfessional Fellowship Practice in Our Mission Fields To Repent of Sin of Unionism —_--_ To Reexamine Evaluation of “Animal Lodges” To Protest Youth Gatherings Involving Our Youth with Members of LCA ___ Lutheran- in Future Fel- 3. Seminary Issues Reports and Statements President's Report Re Resolution 2-28 _ __. Report of Board of Control, St. Louis Seminary Supplemental Report (Dissen-Weber) ——___ Supplemental Report (Fincke-Burmeister) __. Report of Special Task Force on Accreditation To Recognize Reports of Board of Control as Fulfillment of Resolution 2-28 (Also 3-11B, C) To Declare Faculty Statement Inadequate To Reject St.Louis Faculty Statements and Gospel Reductionism To Declare St. Louis Seminary Document Mis- representative and Inadequate a (Also 3-14B, C) To Evaluate Seminary Document (Also 3-15B) To Endorse “Report of Synodical President” — To Support Dr. Preus’ Recommendations To Take Action to Conform with Synod’s Offi- cial Doctrinal Position (Also 3-18B) —_ To Deal Pastorally But Firmly with Those Who Preach, Teach, Publish, Permit, or Promote Doctrine Not in Accord with Biblical, Confes- sional, or LCMS Positions - * “A Statement” and Article I To Discuss and Accept “A Statement” To Introduce Special Rules for Action on “A Statement” or Any Other Doctrinal Matter __ To Not Bring “A Statement” to a Vote To Reaffirm Confessional Basis (Also 3-24B, C) To Accept Articles II and VI as Sole Basis for Faith and Practice nn To Define Article II (Also 3-26B, C) To Revise Article II - To Restate Article II of Sy nod’ s “Constitution _ To Resist Any Addition to Article I] __ To Reaffirm Confessional Commitment of Arti- cle II of Synod’s Constitution —__.._—>=S (Also 3-29B) Not to Adopt “A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles” To Take Action on “Statement” To Use “A Statement” Only for Study —___ (Also 3-32B) To Withdraw “A Statement” 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 97 97 99 100 104 107 117 117 118 118 119 119 119 119 120 120 121 121 121 121 122 122 122 ———. 123 123 123 123 123 124 3-34A 3-35A 3-36A 3-37A 3-38A 3-39A 3-40 3-41 3-42A 3-43A 3-44 3-45A 3-46 3-51 3-52A 3-53A 3-54 3-95 3-56 3-57 3-58A 3-59A 3-60 3-61A 3-62A 3-63A 3-64A 3-65 3-66 3-67 3-68 3-69 3-70A 3-71 3-81A 471 PAGE To Approve “Statement of Scriptural and Con- fessional Principles” —_____»______ 1 (Also 3-34B, C, D) To Use Dr. Preus’ “Statement” ———~-____ 125 (Also 3-35B, C, D, E, F) To Endorse “A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles” —_ 125 (Also 3-36B, C, D, E, F, G. H, I) To Accept “A Statement” 125 (Also 3-37B, C, D) To Approve “A Statement” «i126 (Also 3-38B, C, D, E, F, G) To Commend President Preus for Issuing “A Statement” 127 (Also 3-39B, C, D, E) To Endorse Doctrinal Content of “A State- ment” 127 To Accept “A Statement” and Support the President 127 To Accept “A Statement” as Correct Declara- tion 128 (Also 3-42B, C) To Adopt and Use “A Statement” ____——«*a128 (Also 3-43B, C, D, E, F) To Declare “A Statement” Scriptural 128 To Require Subscription to ‘A Statement” — 129 (Also 3-45B, C) To Bind Professors and Administrators to “A Statement” 129 Methods and Principles of Interpretation To Have Congregations Study the New Meth- ods of Biblical Interpretation ——§ ______ 130 To Permit Teachers to Use Tools of Their Pro- fession 130 (Also 3- 52B) Neither to Endorse Nor Reject Specific Meth- odologies es 6 3 | (Also 3-53B, CI D, E, F, G)_ To Take No Position... sid‘ To Encourage Contemporary Methods of Bible Study —__- 131 To Protest Use of Historical-Critical Method as Acceptable Method 131 To Oppose Single Use of Historical-Critical Method _ 131 To Reject Use of ‘Historical- Critical Method _. 132 (Also 3-58B, C) To Remove the Historical-Critical Method __ 132 (Also 3-59B) To Condemn Methods of Biblical Interpretation Which Question Historical Reliability of Scrip- ture 133 To Reaffirm Lutheran Principles of Interpreta- tion 133 (Also 3- 61B) To Enforce Teaching Inerrancy of Scripture — 134 (Also 3-62B) To Affirm Historicity of Biblical Accounts __ 134 (Also 3-63B, C) To Restrict Use of Historical-Critical Method 135 (Also 3-64B) To Request Both Seminary Faculties to Re- spond to Questions Concerning Historical-Crit- ical Method 135 To Repudiate Historical- Critical Method ___ 136 To Reaffirm Primacy of the Gospel 136 To Confess Scriptural Inerrancy —_ 136 To Assure Adherence to Scripture and Not Simply to a Mystic “Gospel Principle” — 137 To Repudiate “Gospelism” ___ 137 (Also 3-70B) To Emphasize That We Find Christ in the Scriptures 138 AATS To Remedy Conditions Which Precipitated Ac- tion of AATS ____ 138 (Also 3-81B, C, D)