# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S434 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 418 OTHER REPORTS tive shelter in the council for the Inter-Lutheran Commis- sion on Worship and integrating with the council’s Washing-~ which identifies and develops federal government resources which might be employed by the churches in their mission and ministry. The fact that possibilities such as the foregoing are not always realized may not appear to be steps backward. It Where should it be? These questions are particularly germane when on the national level the cooperative possibilities are inadequately explored and decisions are made on bases less than satisfactory to the churches’ stated commitment to cooperation, Meanwhile, the pace at which the council staff is called upon to function continues to Set faster. We must run harder cial resources available to us continue to diminish. Programs and services are added, even though at a modest rate, but Operating budgets do not increase proportionately, For 1972—73 our budget, including special ministries, was $2,542,350, of which the Missouri Synod provided $741,750. Our budget for 1973—74 is $2,685,615, with the Missouri Synod’s share being $747,048. Even without the addition of services and programs, we would have to say that our budgets are not adequate to provide for that which is expected of us. Year-to-year in- creases in our budget have not been equal to the percentage get approximately the same or a few more dollars from year to year, but each budget ives us slightly less buying power. Since most of what the council budget purchases is staff service, our loss of buying power ultimately applies itself in a reduction of staff complement. Some people seem to have the impression that the council staff has since our be- ginning in 1967 gotten larger... of the new staff positions and personnel which have been publicly announced, the total number of people salaried under the council budget since 1967 decreased from 135 to 117. We believe that both Christ’s Prayer for the fuller expe- rience of unity and the reach of the church bodies for greater efficiency can find realization within the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A. The council is available — even eager. We hope that the churches will fully and openly explore the possibilities: C. Thomas Spitz, General Secretary