# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S250 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 248 HIGHER EDUCATION Several other important facts need to be brought out. In the first place, the crisis was not all that serious. Thanks to coura- geous and imaginative district executives and placement officers —and candidates—opportunities for service were eventually found for practically all candidates who were reasonably free and willing to accept positions in any part of the country. Even more important, the entire experience now appears to have been one of the most remarkable acts of blessing and guidance by the church's Lord during the biennium. The entire crisis, whether large or small, signalled one of the most impres- sive breakthroughs in churchly life and ministry in many decades. During the shortage, placement officers felt obligated to place candidates in traditional ministries—in parishes that had consistently supported the work of the church in people and dollars and who now needed personnel, and in ministries that promised some sort of ‘“success’’ in membership acquisitions. But suddenly it was possible to assign, often on a very open, cooperative, experimental basis, young workers to exciting areas of opportunity which had long been crying unsuccessfully for attention. Worker-priest ministries, team ministries, special- ized ministries, shared ministries, ministries in public institu- tions, in public education, in semi-public agencies, ministries which allowed for a strong witness to the Gospel and a distinc- tively Christian presence in distinctively nontraditional roles— these now became possible. In fact, it is very likely that in some instances what appeared at first simply to be expedient because of a financial or personnel crisis actually turned out to be a move we should have made as our first choice. Because of the experimental nature of these ministries, a somewhat higher “failure” rate should be expected. Some have already ‘‘failed" and the persons involved are naturally some- what unhappy. But these failures are often by traditional stan- dards. They do not diminish the excitement which the Lord in- jected into the church with His magnificent sense of timing. The number of parishes using a director of Christian educa- tion grew rapidly during the biennium ~ although fiscal problems kept the rate of growth lower than predicted. A few failures were experienced—usually attributed to the general lack of understanding and experience with team ministries in our Synod. But most responses by congregations, directors of Chris- tian education, and pastors were enthusiastic. Many more of our parishes need professional help in their educational programs. Our colleges have some of the best experiences and best pro- grams of any denomination in preparing directors of Christian education. The opportunity for individual parishes or combina- tions of parishes to secure such a competent person to meet their needs is better today than at any other time in the last 20 years. In the past, the leaders in many parishes and consolidated schools have complained that so few synodically trained grad- uates were available for their teaching staffs. Some of these schools have been using the present availability of teacher graduates from synodical schools to upgrade their faculties in terms of academic and theological background. More schools should be doing so. —In Funding How does the financial future look for synodical colleges? The information available to the Board for Higher Education — including the records of past financial performance by the church, the needs and challenges faced by the Synod as seen by its leaders, the potential income for Synod from the members of the church, the studies and projections concerning the future of our schools, and the opinions available from prominent men in the American higher educational scene — all indicate that our schools can move ahead, under God, and will have the funds needed to do an even more effective job of providing workers for the church, if rigorous and concerted efforts are made in at least four areas involving finances. One area, of course, is economy. As indicated in this report earlier, some aspects of the recent belt tightening have been good. And it will, without a doubt, be essential that our colleges and seminaries continue to practice every possible economy without limiting the objectives of the system. The board is hope- ful that the proposed study of synodical higher education will discover even additional ways to achieve more efficient opera- tion, without any sacrifice of quality. The board still considers the consolidation of some existing schools as a possible wise move toward greater economy, and it intends to keep pursuing this possibility with the schools and the boards of control. The second area relates to subsidy. As was shown earlier in this report, the percentages of income in all categories which came from synodical subsidy dropped sharply again during the past biennium. This trend must be remedied. In looking at total needs for the system, the board considers the following to be minimum goals for subsidy during the next two years (for background information, see Figures 5, 6, and 7 given earlier): current income—38% of total: plant funds—a return to approximately $10 per year per student; capital income—50% of the total. Assuming that funds other than subsidy and student fees can be increased sharply during the next several years, the board sees the possibility that subsidy might gradually be reduced by 1980 to an average of 35% of all costs in all areas. However, evidence available at this time indicates that any reduction beyond that level would seriously jeopardize the efforts of the schools to fulfill the objectives of the Synod. The third area relates to student fees and student aid. Most of the sharp reductions in the past biennium in the percentage of operating costs being paid by synodical subsidy have been absorbed through student fees, as seen in Figure 8. Almost all FIGURE 8 PERCENT OF CURRENT INCOME WHICH CAME FROM SYNODICAL SUBSIDY AND STUDENT FEES 1963-1972 Ne eee ee ee n a, o Year 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 sare Exal 1972 of the synodical schools indicate that the costs for the past year for the average boarding student were well above $2,000. Stu- dent fees have been rising at a rate three times as fast as the overall economy. As can be seen in Figure 9, the average dollar increase in tuition payments during the past biennium was as great as the total for the preceeding 7 years combined. Addi- FIGURE 9 AVERAGE TUITION PAYMENTS ° BY STUDENTS AT SYNODICAL SCHOOLS 1963-1972 590 560 530 500 350 320 290 260