# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S35 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 35 American Lutheran Church to abide by its 1970 resolution to permit the ordination of women to the pastoral office. e. Instruct its representatires on the Commission on Fellow- ship to intensify their efforts 1) To reach agreement at the denominational level on the matter of ordaining women to the pastoral office. 2) To achiere and demonstrate a broadly based. multi-level consensus in the doctrine of the authority of Holy Scripture and the basis and nature of fellowship. 3) To arrive at a common position and practice on other matters which have been referred to the Commission on Fellow- ship. such as the lodge question and membership in ecumenical organizations. f. Continue to advise its “pastors. congregations. boards. and commissions. because of doctrinal concerns still remaining be- tween the two church bodies. to defer new implementation of fellowship with the American Lutheran Church” (1971 Res. 3-21. last “Resolved”) until our Synod’s concerns are resolved. g. Implore the blessings and guidance of the Holy Spirit upon the discussions between our two church bodies to the end that our fellowship may be deepened and strengthened. D. Lutheran Church in America 1971 Resolution 3-14 asked the President of the Synod in conjunction with the CTCR “to assure the Lutheran Church in America of our readiness to meet officially with a view toward finding the agreement in doctrine necessary for the establishing of altar and pulpit fellowship.” Since the traditional position of the Lutheran Church in America is that formal doctrinal discussions are unnecessary for church bodies sub- scribing to the same Lutheran Confessions, the commission endorsed the proposal of President Robert Marshall of the Lutheran Church in America and President Preus to engage the services of the Division of Theological Studies of the Lu- theran Council in the U.S.A. for a discussion of relevant theo- logical issues. For this purpose, the Division of Theological Studies has convened a “Consultation on the Function of Doctrine and Theology in Light of the Unity of the Church.” The church body presidents of the Lutheran Church in America, the American Lutheran Church, and The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod have each appointed four representatives to this consultation. Our Synod’s representatives are Pastors Roland Hopmann, Albert Marcis, Robert Preus, and Ralph Bohlmann. In the two meetings of this consultation held to date, the topics discussed include the basis of fellowship, the relation- ship between the Gospel and Holy Scripture, the Gospel and the Church, the Gospel and Doctrine, and a comparison of tradi- tional and contemporary methods of Biblical interpretation. Two additional meetings of this consultation have been planned for 1973 and 1974. The commission recommends: 17. That the Synod a. Express its appreciation for the discussions that hare been held to date with representatires of the Lutheran Church in America: b. Encourage its President. in consultation with the CTCR. to continue to seek additional opportunities for multi-level doc- trinal discussions with the Lutheran Church in America: c. Request the President and the CTCR to report the progress and results of these discussions to the Synod. E. Consultation on Lutheran Unity In 1970, the Inter-Lutheran Consultation produced a state- ment entitled “The Statement of the Participating Bodies in the LCUSA Regarding Lutheran Unity” (ef. 1971 Workbook. pp. 40—41). This statement makes proposals for the achievement of a greater degree of Lutheran unity in America. including the possibility of structural unity or merger. In connection with its adoption of this statement in 1970, the American Lutheran Church invited the Lutheran Church in America and The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod to participate in an imple- mentation committee that would “develop and propose to the participating churches as rapidly as possible common organiza- tional structures and when this is not possible, structures that will lend themselves most easily to joint activity.” In response to these activities and proposals, the 1971 convention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod noted the content of the statement, stated our Synod’s procedure for working toward Lutheran unity, indicated that our Synod is “primarily oriented toward altar and pulpit fellowship and further cooperative activities, rather than organic union,” authorized the President of the Synod to appoint “four representatives to the discussions of the committee.’ and asked the pastors and congregations of the Synod to give careful consideration to the issues raised by the proposals to achieve common organizational structures. (Res. 3-26) The committee referred to in the proposal of the American Lutheran Church as well as in 1971 Resolution 3-26 held its initial meeting after the 1972 conventions of the Lutheran Church in America and the American Lutheran Church. It chose as its name “Consultation on Lutheran Unity.” elected officers, developed ground rules, and decided to meet five times during the coming year. A second meeting of the consulta- tion reviewed the history of Lutheran unity efforts by the three Lutheran bodies, compared the differences in polity between the three church bodies, and discussed possible models for common organizational structures. In its next meeting, the consultation proposes to give further examination to ways of achieving structural unity. The representatives of The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod to this consultation are Drs. Roland Wiederaenders, Herbert Mueller, Wilbert Griesse, and Ralph Bohlmann. The commission recommends: 18 a. That the Synod’s participation in the work of this con- sultation continue to be instructed by the principles set forth in 1971 Resolution 3-26. b. That the President of the Synod be requested to keep the Synod fully informed on the progress of this consultation. F. Lutheran Council in the U. S.A. The Commission continued to receive regular reports on the activities of the Lutheran Council. particularly in connection with the studies authorized by 1971 Resolution 3-18. as well as the ongoing activities of the Council's Division of Theological Studies. The Synod's three members on the standing committee of that Division are also members of the CTCR. They are Drs. Theodore Nickel, Richard Schultz, and Ralph Bohlmann. The commission is particularly interested in the theological evalu- ation called for in Section II of 1971 Resolution 3-18 and hopes to devote attention to the results of that study during the next biennium. G. Lutheran World Federation 1971 Resolution 3-06 directed the commission to evaluate the Fifth General Assembly of the Lutheran World Federation held in Evian, France, in 1970. As the basis for this evaluation, the commission reviewed the official documents, minutes. and reports of this assembly which were graciously supplied by the officers of the Lutheran World Federation, or were otherwise available in published form. It also took note of materials pub- lished on the 1970 LWF assembly by two of our Synod’s official representatives, Dr. William Buege and Dr. David Scaer. A communication from Dr. Paul Empie. former head of the U.S. A. national committee of the LWF, also received serious attention. The commission’s evaluation, entitled ‘Evian in Retrospect.” devotes particular attention to theological and fellowship actions of the 1970 LWF assembly: it is submitted with this report as Appendix E. The commission recommends: 19. That the Synod keep in contact with developments in the program of the Lutheran World Federation by being represented at its meetings in the role of observers and by other means. but that the Synod respectfully decline to make application for mem- bership in the Lutheran World Federation at this time. H. NCC and WCC Previous conventions of The Lutheran Church-— Missouri Synod have asked the commission to prepare materials for the Synod on the World Council of Churches and the National Council of Churches in Christ. The commission reported to the 1971 convention that it was delaying the preparation of such guidelines and reports because of the structural changes being discussed in both of those ecumenical organizations. The commission recommended and the Synod adopted various