# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1935_S147 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Ev. Luth, Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1935. 188 namely, the God-given Gospel of Jesus Christ, and since our pastoral conferences and other agencies of Synod are, and in the past have been, carefully studying the problems confronting our Church in its practical work, , Resolved, That we do not create a new committee for this purpose. Action of Synod. This resolution wag adopted. B. VARIOUS MISSIONS. Report of Board of Home ‘Missions in North America. (Memorial 301.) Several months prior to the last. triennial convention the eco- nomic stringency in our country and the enormous deficit in the synodical treasury compelled Synod’s Board of Directors to reduce the allowances granted to the various synodical boards. In this pro- cedure the budget of our Board received ten-per-cent. cut. Though this cut was not in proportion to what other departments of Synod suffered, yet it was difficult to foretell how this would react on the Districts that are largely dependent on our support. Would it force them to dismiss some of their men and to abandon strategic stations within their territory? Such and similar questions momentarily caused us deep concern. But at the end of this triennium we can report to the glory of God that our apprehensions were unfounded. The Lord, who in Israel at the time of a great drought sustained the prophet Elijah and at a later date supplied the physical needs of thousands with a few loaves of bread and fishes, has in a most won- derful manner provided likewise for the hundreds: of missionaries under our supervision. Every one of them has been privileged to remain at his post and to feed the flock entrusted to his care. Not one among them has to our knowledge lacked the necessities of life. For this manifestation of the Lord’s providence we, as a Synod and as individuals, have all reason to thank Him. We can furthermore report that our work of Home Missions despite the distressful conditions has enjoyed a normal and healthy growth during the past triennium. The pressure which the brethren in the subsidized Districts had to endure did not discourage them, but rather aroused them to a deeper consciousness over against Synod’s needs and stimulated them to greater zeal and activity in the work of the Lord’s vineyard. Due to this vitalizing effect a large number of subsidized congregations increased their contributions towards the support of their pastors and in many instances have become self- sustaining. Moreover, some missionaries, because of consolidations