# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1935_S136 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 124. Proceedings of Thirty-Sixth Regular Convention, 5. That the Secretary of Missions serve as an advisory member on the Board of European Missions, on the Board of South American Missions, on the Board of Foreign Missions, on the Board for Mis- sions to the Deaf and Blind, and on the General Church Extension Board; 6. That these resolutions be added to the regulations governing the respective boards and that all stipulations in these regulations which are not in agreement with these resolutions be and are hereby repealed. We believe that in this friendly way, as above mentioned, the Secretary of Missions will present, for the present at least, a suf- ficient agency of coordination between all-our ‘missions, and we may see from time to time what further arrangement may be necessary. We wish to avoid setting up a machinery on theory only. , Action of Synod. This report was adopted. Report of the General Church Extension Board. (Memorial 305.) The Church Extension Board of Synod is cognizant of having had a considerably restricted activity during the triennium which is covered by this report. We feel that we may best describe our policy as one of meticulous anxiety and extraordinary care in the preser- vation of Synod’s funds. During these three years 73 requests for financial aid reached the Church Extension Board from our congrega- tions and Districts. The total sum asked for was $397,638.26. The number of petitions granted was 87, and the aggregate amount of loans made during these three years was $141,923.97. It is quite possible that members of Synod will come to the conclusion that the Church Extension Board has fallen short of Synod’s expectations by restricting its activities to this extent. Yet we feel sure that there will be others who will commend our zealous care for the accumulated money in the Church Extension Fund. We were confronted on every hand by accounts of the dwindling resources of our congregations, resulting in a decreased ability to make good their promises of pay- ment. We found that congregations that had made substantial loans on the strength of their undoubted ability to pay failed to raise the necessary money; we saw glowing prospects for growth grow dim through the storm of depression; in many cases we felt, after study- ing the application for a loan very carefully, that the prospects for repayment were not good and that it would be necessary to place the congregation into the delinquent list almost at the very beginning; a considerable number of applications had for their purpose the pay- ing of debts made by the congregation, a type of loan disapproved by