# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1935_S96 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 84 Proceedings of Thirty-Sixth Regular Convention, Committee 1 reported: — Your Committee recommends that the Board of Control of Con- cordia College, Fort Wayne, be authorized to enter into an agreement with the congregations at Fort Wayne regarding the use of college property for high-school Purposes, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, under conditions set forth in the overture, Action of Synod. This recommendation was adopted. Coeducation at Our Colleges. (Memorial 121.) Wuergas, The injunction of God’s Word concerning religious training pertains to girls as well-as‘to boys, a truth stressed in utter- ances of the fathers of Synod as well as by the Lutheran pulpit and press of our own day; and Wuergas, The laws of many States have extended compulsory education beyond the eighth grade, a procedure affecting girls as well as boys; and : WHEREAS, Many parents and pastors are greatly concerned in these perilous times about the environment of secondary education for girls; and Wuenreas, In some Districts of Synod it seems possible to satisfy this concern only by admitting girls to the classrooms of our synod- ical colleges 3 and Wuereas, Coeducation has already been introduced in some educational institutions of the Missouri Synod and of affiliated synods; and Wuereas, The California and Nevada District, in its convention of 1984, was confronted with such forceful pleas for the privilege of coeducation at California Concordia College; and Wuergas, An overture pleading for coeducation at California Concordia College was presented to your Hon. Body in 1929 by a pas- toral conference of the California and Nevada District, which is still pending (see Proceedings, 1929); therefore be it Resolved, Respectfully to petition your Hon. Body to empower the Board of Control of any synodical college to introduce coedu- cation; provided — 1) That there is evidence of a strong desire for coeducation on the part of its constituency ; 2) That coeducation will hot interfere with the paramount pur- pose of our colleges, namely, the preparation of young men for the public ministry of the Word; my