# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Juli 1859_S223 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Gleanings from Reading. 223 to increase his party; just as he also permitted the Landgrave of Hesse to take a second wife alongside his still-living wife." — Thus it reads. And beneath this stand, as an aid for the teacher, the questions: "Who was the author of the falling-away from the Church in the sixteenth century? What sort of man was he? By what means did he begin his struggle against the Church? Did he stop there? How did he then behave toward the Pope? What innovations did he introduce? What did he permit to monks and nuns? What to princes and lords? Was his conduct edifying? Did he teach the pure Word of God? Name me some of his errors! What reception did his teaching find among the common people and among the great? How did Luther show himself compliant toward the Landgrave of Hesse?" — Is there not almost a lie or a distortion of the truth in nearly every sentence? And how might it sound at times when spoken aloud! — The Protestant Supreme Consistory has naturally not let this pass unchallenged. Representations were accordingly made in higher places, "to give the objectionable passages a different wording." After four years of waiting one now learns: "that corresponding arrangements have now been made to remove, for the future, the passages which, in their wording, might give occasion for a disturbance of church peace." — So it stands in the Erlangen Journal for Protestantism and Church (of October 1858). It thus remains to be seen whether and how it is removed. But what of what already stands written on the "fleshly tables of the heart"? — Preserve us, Lord, by your Word, and curb the murderous rage of pope and Turk! K. (Pilger.) ——— Gleanings from Reading. ——— Böhner says in the preface to his work on Christianity and Materialism: "When Mr. Büchner, in the first edition of his 'Force and Matter,' already triumphs in advance that people of materialistic outlook will soon form the majority and improve the world according to their dogma; when he even hurls the curse of 'narrow-mindedness' at the head of every scholar who dares to be of a different opinion than his own — then we must leave judgment on such passionate outbursts to others, since we are not concerned here in the least with persons and insults. We permit ourselves to cite only one actual fact to illustrate such logic. In an insane asylum at Leyden, a patient explained to a visiting stranger, in a very obliging manner, the suitable arrangements of the institution. To the stranger's question, 'What business, then, do you have, sir, in this house?' the patient replied ironically, with sparkling eyes: 'I am insane.' — When the stranger then looked at him in astonishment, the patient added haughtily: 'Unfortunately, men of my talent still form the minority in the world at present, but I tell you, as soon as we form the majority