# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Juni 1859_S176 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 176 Thoughts on Modern Theology. was united, which was also anointed with the Holy Spirit — even so, in the agony of soul, neither the united Godhead nor the Spirit who was present openly freed either the body or the soul of Christ from weakness, but they left this to the angel who strengthened him. Gregory of Nazianzus (†390): Just as, when the sun is covered by a cloud, its brightness is hindered, not darkened, not taken away — so also that man whom the Son of God took to himself did not have the Godhead snatched away from within him, but only hidden. Ambrose (†397): He emptied himself, that is, he withdrew his power from action, so that in the humiliation, through the resting of his power, he seemed to become weak. Athanasius (†373), on Christ's word "My soul is troubled": This came about in that the Godhead rested while the flesh rose up; for it was possible for the Godhead to prevent the trouble, but it did not will to, lest it destroy the likeness it had with us. Just as in a mixed honey-drink now the water, now the honey is more abundant, so the Godhead sometimes permits the flesh to be more abundant, but at other times surpasses it, in order to bring the weakness of the flesh to nothing. Cyril (†444), on Christ's word "I thirst": It would not have been difficult for the all-powerful Word to remove this too from his own flesh, but just as he willingly allowed the flesh to suffer the other things, so also this. Leo the Great: The humiliation was a condescension of mercy, not a diminishing of power. (Contributed.) Thoughts on Modern Theology. Whoever takes even a superficial notice of the achievements of modern believing theology must very soon become convinced that it suffers from certain essential, deep-reaching, fundamental flaws. In general these may perhaps be most aptly described as a weakening of the biblical content of truth. How this came about historically — how Pietism, Rationalism, Supranaturalism, and Unionism mutually conditioned and called forth one another, and now unite in the broad stream of subjectivism, which selects from the Bible as God's Word only that which appears acceptable as such to the pious self — this shall only be briefly indicated here. But inasmuch as half-believing subjectivism raises the self to the supreme principle, the content of revelation naturally cannot come into its own right. The biblical doctrines are either denied, or halved, or otherwise so altered that they lose both the definiteness and integrity that originally belong to them according to the Word of God, and also the significance which, in the context of the