# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_April 1859_S116 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 116 (Contributed.) On the Difference in the Law between the Missouri Synod and the So-Called "Lutheran" General Synod. That the two synods are not of one mind, that the Missouri Synod indeed has a different spirit than the General Synod, is evident. This difference is also often felt keenly enough as unpleasant on both sides, and is expressed more or less clearly and sharply. Thus, for example, the "Missionary" and other papers of the General Synod evidently take nothing less than pleasure in the "spirit" that shows itself in the Missouri Synod, and therefore naturally also in that Synod's own organs, its periodicals. And that the spirit of the General Synod does not please us is shown plainly enough by the fact that we repeatedly and decisively, and publicly, attack it as dangerous and false. Such a rending of the Lutheran Church, such an inner estrangement, coldness — indeed, mutual conflict among its individual members — is deeply to be lamented. How glorious it would be, how the Lutheran Church could let her light shine to the glory of God and the furtherance of His kingdom, if in both German and English tongue the pure confession of our Church were proclaimed in unity and strength, and stepped into the confusion of the sects! But let no one suppose that this unity can be achieved, that the deep-seated rift can be healed, by a glossing-over external courtesy, by the outward appearance of brotherly love and brotherly phrases. The real discord, the inner antipathy, is thereby at most only temporarily veiled, and lets its own true nature show through all the more bitterly on occasion. We at least will have nothing to do with hollow brotherly phrases; we will and must maintain the outward separation until it is in truth inwardly overcome and abolished. Once we are of one faith, one mind, one and the same opinion, then we are also brothers; until then we must contest and refuse the name of brotherhood. Now, to heal an injury, the first remedy is to uncover it openly, to have the courage to be sincere and truthful. Let us therefore first show what these synods have against one another, how the spirit in them stands opposed to one another: the General Synod finds in the Missouri Synod too much narrowness of mind and too little brotherly love; whereas the Missouri Synod finds in the General Synod too much carnal, false love and too little honesty toward God and man. The deeper ground of this going-apart-and-going-against-one-another, however, lies in this: that in the Missouri Synod respect for God and His Word prevails, the Word of God is its sole rule — not in doctrine alone, but also in love, and in the judging of church affairs generally — whereas in the General Synod the old enemy, Dame Hulda, dear Reason, carries on her mischief,