# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_December 1864_S383 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Church and Contemporary History. 383 The descent into hell benefits his own, the believers, but not the unbelieving and the damned; it benefits, above all, the living, so that they do not come into the φυλακή [prison], but not the dead, so that they might come back out of the dungeon — whoever teaches otherwise teaches according to his own private fancy, and should take good care that he does not undermine the foundation and shake the whole structure of Christian doctrine." And in closing: "After all these discussions we turn back again to the beginning and sum up the results, in the hope that this or that reader may have been confirmed in his 'childlike faith' and may have drawn some material from what has been presented for the defense against modern theories. So: no epoch-making influence of the descent into hell upon the limbus Patrum, the Old Testament Sheol; still less the establishment of a continuing evangelical preaching for those who died in unbelief; further, no confusion of the descent into hell with Christ's state of death, and no division of his person, as if the soul alone had gone down to hell. On every one of these wrong paths one plunges into the very greatest dogmatic difficulties and tears oneself loose from Scripture, which lets the whole Christ go down to hell, there to preach judgment, after he had taken up his new life; the right way is simply the long-trodden one, that we do not dispute much, with the Formula of Concord, about the How, but rather simply believe and teach as Luther already believed according to Scripture and taught in particular at Torgau: 'So I too believe here, that Christ himself in person destroyed hell and bound the devil; whether God grant the banner, gates, doors, and chains were of wood, of iron, or none at all, that matters nothing, if only I hold fast to this: that by such images it is signified that I should believe concerning Christ; which is the main point, the use and the power we have from it, namely that neither hell nor the devil can take captive or harm me and all who believe in him.' (20, p. 170)." We must invite our readers to read the essay itself. It belongs among the now so rare instances of sound Lutheran theology. "Sonntagsbote" ["Sunday Messenger"] is the title of a Christian people's paper which has appeared in Saxony alongside the "Pilger" ["Pilgrim"] since July 1 of this year. The "Sonntagsbote" is edited by Pastors Florey, Mehr, and Stichart, and appears weekly on a quarter- sheet at an annual price of 16 groschen. It appears that the change which has come over the "Pilger" since the beginning of this year called into being the idea of letting such a paper as the "Sonntagsbote" appear alongside the "Pilger." The latter has namely begun to strike a somewhat higher tone and to make somewhat greater demands on the understanding and taste of its readers. In particular it has of late communicated much bearing on church art history. It is very doubtful whether the dear "Pilger," in its present condition, does more good than it formerly did. The Luther Society at Stade (a kind of Gustav-Adolph Society, except that the former is confessional) celebrated its 8th annual festival on August 30. Its yearly income had amounted to about 666 thalers, of which, among other things, 132 thalers were allotted to our pro-seminary at Steeden and 40 thalers to the "Church in North America." Waldeck. Nagel writes as follows in his "Kirchenblatt" of July 1: "It will bring our readers joy and strengthening of faith to hear that two Lutheran congregations have recently constituted themselves in the Principality of Waldeck and have attached themselves to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Prussia in such a way that they intend to conform entirely to our rule, both in confession and in constitution. These are the congregations of Sachsenberg and Corbach. As early as 1859 some Lutherans of Waldeck, who believed the Lutheran Church of their land endangered or already destroyed by the Union Edict of the year 1821, had turned to Pastor Crome with a request for advice. They were first advised to ask their prince for protection of the Lutheran Church, and, failing that, to break off church fellowship with united clergy and to attempt, together with those pastors of their land who still stood on the Lutheran confession, the restoration of the Lutheran church. For a long time we heard nothing of the further development of this matter. In the year 1861 Pastor Rocholl in Sachsenberg, for the sake of the union, laid down his