# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_November 1864_S322 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 322 The Doctrine of the Lutheran Church Concerning Sunday. of the age of the Reformation concerning the distinction between Law and Gospel, as well as of the Old and New Testaments and of Christian liberty, it was entirely impossible that these same men could have taught otherwise about the New Testament Sunday than they in fact taught. It will therefore above all be necessary here that we call to mind the original doctrine of our church in the age of the Reformation, that is, the only truly Lutheran doctrine of Sunday, and indeed according to its very wording, and then also hear some of those theologians to whom we owe, in the time that followed, the succession of doctrine on this point as well. First of all, we let the relevant passages of our public confessional writings follow here. Thus it is stated in Article 28 of the Augsburg Confession: "Furthermore it is disputed whether bishops also have the power to establish ceremonies in the church, likewise ordinances concerning food, holy days, and the various orders of church servants. Those who grant this power to the bishops appeal to this saying of Christ, John 16:12: I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now; but when the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all truth. They also adduce for this the example of Acts 15:20, 29, where they forbade blood and things strangled. So too it is cited that the Sabbath was changed into Sunday contrary to the Ten Commandments, or so they reckon it, and no example is pressed and invoked so strongly as the changing of the Sabbath, and they wish thereby to maintain that the power of the church is great, since it has dispensed with the Ten Commandments and altered something in them. What then should one hold concerning Sunday and similar other church ordinances and ceremonies? To this our people give this answer, that the bishops or pastors may make ordinances so that things proceed in an orderly manner in the church — not in order to obtain God's grace thereby, nor to make satisfaction for sin, nor to bind consciences by holding such things to be a necessary service of God, and to reckon it a sin if they are broken without offense. Thus St. Paul ordained to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 11:5–6) that the women should cover their heads in the assembly. Likewise, that the preachers in the assembly should not all speak at once, but in order, one after another. Such order is fitting for the Christian assembly to observe for the sake of love and peace, and to be obedient to the bishops and pastors in these matters, and to keep them so far as this, that one does not give offense to another, so that there may be no disorder or unruly conduct in the church. Yet in such a way that consciences are not burdened, so that one should hold such things to be necessary to salvation, and reckon it a sin if they are broken without giving offense to others — for indeed no one