# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Juni 1864_S161 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Lehre und Wehre. Volume X. June 1864. No. 6. (Submitted by Pastor Baumstark.) The Modern Theory of the Various Doctrinal Types of the New Testament. Among the fundamental doctrines of our church which are, to present-day theology, a stumbling block and a sign that is spoken against by it, one of particular importance for theological life, both now and in the near future, is its doctrine of inspiration. Of those theologians who nowadays still hold fast to the old, unaltered concept of inspiration held by Luther and the orthodox fathers of our church, there are in any case very few. For apart from the openly unbelieving and rationalistic theologians, to whom the Bible is not only an ordinary book but a particularly stupid one, whose ridiculous errors it is an extraordinary pleasure and a welcome opportunity for them to demonstrate, so as to prove their own acumen — apart from these, numerous errors are also being charged to the Holy Ghost in most of the commentaries of those theologians who fought against rationalism and became the forerunners of today's "believing" school; and even from professorial chairs occupied by "believing" theologians, the old concept of inspiration is spoken of as a doctrine of whose untenability one has long since become convinced, as of an outmoded standpoint; and it has been found, precisely in the most recent times, in the case of several scholars reckoned as heroes of the Lutheran Church and of orthodox theology, that in the course of their scholarly investigations in the field of biblical introduction and exegesis they arrived at results whose striking coincidence with rationalistic ideas and assertions was no pleasant surprise for the church. And how could it be otherwise? How can those whose scholarly research is not absolutely governed and pervaded by simple, childlike faith in Scripture as the Word of God, but instead grants human knowledge a competent judicial seat alongside and above Scripture, and who with it wish to serve not the church but human scholarship — how can they arrive at other results? Whoever gives himself