# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_December 1863_S372 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 372 The Discords in the Lutheran Church of Prussia. no one at home held himself to the far-reaching synodical resolutions, that every pastor sought to come to terms with his congregation as best he could. But that was unbearable all the same; such a conflict between church order and actual life could not possibly continue indefinitely. — Then suddenly a flash of lightning shot through the fog: it was Pastor Diedrich's pamphlet on the worth and nature of church government, which appeared as preparatory work for the general synod of 1860. It is an undeniable merit of this little work of Diedrich's that it attacked at the root the unspiritual and falsely legalistic character of the church order, and above all the unevangelical concept of church government as an office of command set over the Church with divine authority and governing it, and clearly brought out the purely evangelical and spiritual nature of the Church as the kingdom of Christ. But deeply to be lamented was the harshness and abruptness with which Diedrich came forward, forgetting all regard for what already existed, and branding the character of the synodical resolutions and of the existing Breslau church government as "chiliastic, papistic, antichristian." Still, a banner had now been raised, a fixed point had been given, around which the spirits and the parties now divided for and against. There followed the stormy general synod of 1860. It produced little result; it formed only the opening skirmish, in which the opponents came to know one another and measured their strength; the majority only then began to inform and orient themselves more closely on the actual point of dispute. Only a few — seven pastors in all — laid before the close of the synod a declaration in which they offered, for the sake of love and order, to comply outwardly as far as possible with the synodical resolutions in the manner hitherto followed, while protesting against everything in them contrary to conscience. Pastor Diedrich personally made public apology for everything offensive "in outward form" that had lain in the attacks he had made against the Supreme Church Council. On the whole the synod came to no decision; it was left to the church government to proceed further in Diedrich's case as it might deem necessary and proper. Finally people united to found a new theological journal, the Synodalblatt, to whose editorship Pastor Lohmann was appointed, whose purpose was to be exclusively the discussion of the theological points in dispute. An unfortunate fatality lay in the matter: namely, that the attack on the synodical resolutions — however salutary and necessary the energy was with which it was made — nevertheless proceeded from a man like Diedrich, who, on the one hand, damaged his own cause so greatly by the offensive abruptness of its form, and, on the other hand, was not himself free of exaggeration in the matter itself. By both of these, the Supreme Church Council in Breslau was provoked, indeed compelled, to disciplinary action against Diedrich. For when Diedrich, as indeed happened, went on publicly representing, in journals read in every congregation, the existing church order, the church government, and its manner, as naked Antichristianity, that could of course