# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Mai 1863_S131 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — What Do the Apostles Say, and What Does Christ the Lord Say, About Our Catechism Controversy. 131 wishes and claims, must yield and surrender itself. — Concrete examples always demonstrate more vividly than general and abstract concepts. Thus one may perhaps recognize from this in what sense I say, with the Apostle Paul, that one must take one's reason captive to the obedience of faith. Reason itself grasps what arouses its contradiction as the content of the divine Word, but is then overcome and bowed down by a higher power that meets it in the Word: so that its very assent is not its own doing, not even in such particular points of doctrine as still stand very far from the center of the saving faith. 3. The Doctrine of the Office of the Keys and of Confession. Christ says: I am a physician for the sick! Sinners alone come to him — those who know and feel that they are sinners. He, who as true God searches the heart, meets the sighs of penitence with the holy absolution. To his disciples he thereafter commits the preaching office, with the word: Whose sins you forgive, they are forgiven them, and so on. That he has bestowed this comforting power on the whole congregation, and that the pastors only administer the keys, is not the place here to set forth further. Suffice it that the office is given to the Church, and that this office affords great comfort to every sincere heart (to such a one, namely, its own sin is not unknown). For this reason Luther too, who knew from his own experience how needful the absolution is for every poor soul, and the voice of Christ that sounds in it from heaven into the heart, watched as a faithful servant at the sanctuary that it should remain with the Lutheran Church. Well known is his valiant word: "If a thousand upon a thousand worlds were mine, I would not let the smallest piece of this confession be taken out of the Church!" Have the needs of the soul meanwhile become different? Is there no more sin? Has the sinner any other remedy than that of redemption and reconciliation with God through Christ? Does faith no longer come through the Gospel, through the preaching of it "publicly," and through the dispensing of the word of grace according to need (and this need is always proper to penitence) also "privately"? Let no one say that such a confession is a "Catholicizing" practice. From what is actually, and wrongly, called "Catholic," our private absolution lacks the papal doctrine of the judicial power of the priest — the doctrine that, through contrition of heart, through the individual confession of sins, and through one's own satisfaction, grace is obtained only conditionally, with a hope dependent upon it. It is likewise false that our doctrine of the keys ascribes to the pastor a kind of mediatorial office. He comes into consideration here only insofar as Christ's word is proclaimed through his ministry — as everyone ought to know, though he would do better first to inform himself properly on the matter in the proper quarter, before he dares, by rash pronouncements, to mislead those who once