# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_December 1862_S372 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 372 Church and Contemporary History. The same reviewer reviews the work of Bauer, Inspector of the Mission Institute at Neuendettelsau: The So-Called Chiliasm. Nördlingen, 1860, as follows: In this work defending chiliasm, the following seven points are discussed briefly and to the point: 1) to set up, against the reprehensible chiliasm rejected by our Church, a legitimate and scriptural chiliasm; 2) to establish the facts hoped for by it; 3) to examine its scriptural basis; 4) to set this doctrinal point alongside the Lutheran teaching; 5) to demonstrate its practical significance; 6) whether this doctrine belongs in the pulpit; 7) whether it could give cause for schism. The most important point is naturally the third, the examination of the Scripture passages; everything else will be understood of itself; but it is precisely over this point that the lecturer passes remarkably quickly; he does not even discuss — no, he merely touches — the passages 2 Thess. 2:3; Rom. 11; Matt. 23:38-39; Rev. 7 and 11, and, from the Old Testament, Dan. 2 and 7, as well as Ezek. 37. The whole Judaizing understanding of the Old Testament is presupposed, and this is combined in an improper way with Rev. 20 — as has already been censured elsewhere by the reviewer in this journal (1861, III, p. 412 ff.). The greatest exegetical difficulty is said to lie in determining where to place Christ's return, whether before or after the thousand-year kingdom. The difficulty is resolved by "assuming" a double return, and to this unscriptural makeshift we then owe the view that "Christ, from Zion, will exercise over all kingdoms and peoples a rule as gracious as it is powerful, corresponding to the peculiar conditions of that period. It is the highest bloom and consummation, the kingdom-form of the Church of Christ on earth." Despite the restrictions by which the author limits this earthly hope, we must therefore say: it is untrue what Paul says: "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." No, no longer the most miserable, for we may hope for the Millennium, and Shem-Hamphoras will give us a share in his Zion- kingdom. Such a doctrine does not seem to us as innocent as it appears to the author, and should it gain still more ground than hitherto in the breadth of the congregations, we should not know why this fanaticism should not work as divisively for the Church as many another. At present much tolerance is being preached in Neuendettelsau, but whoever sows the wind will reap the whirlwind. Church and Contemporary History. I. America. The Church and the Military Power in Conflict. The following we read in a New York political paper of October 25, in a correspondence from New Orleans: "Last week Governor Shepley issued an order to the rectors of the various Episcopal churches that henceforth divine service should be held