# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_October 1860_S314 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 314 The Present State of the Lutheran Church in Norway. as having binding force, it is nevertheless a thoroughly Lutheran church. It is, however, threatened not a little from various and opposing sides, so that it needs the diligent intercession of all faithful Lutherans. In the Reformation era the gospel was forced by the Danish kings upon a people still clinging to Papism, and it therefore took a very long time before it could penetrate the hearts of the people to any degree. The whole sixteenth and seventeenth centuries therefore give the impression of a wasteland in the Norwegian church — but from the first half of the past century on, some life did stir among people and clergy, of which Egede and Thomas von Westen give testimony. At this time there worked in Norway the Bishop of Bergen, Erich Pontoppidan, who may be regarded as the father of the Norwegian church. His explanations of the Lutheran catechism have made the deepest impression on the people and may be called their symbolical book. But since Pontoppidan was, though a very moderate one, still a Pietist, a pietistic element thereby entered the people, an element considerably strengthened through the work of the well-known lay preacher Hauge. Hauge was, at the beginning of this century, in the time of rationalistic unbelief that had not spared the Norwegian church either, a mighty voice of awakening. Even now the pietistic tendency asserts itself strongly; the Norwegian national character has a certain predilection for it, and local circumstances favor this direction. The congregations are often very large and, given the sparse population, scattered over a wide area. In this land of mountains and coasts a pastor can sometimes reach individual parts of his congregation only with great difficulty. Hence both the preaching and, even more, the pastoral care of the pastors are often quite inadequate, especially when the latter are themselves more or less lukewarm. Actual rationalists no longer exist here (would to God this could also be said of Baden, Bavaria, Saxony, and so forth). The law places nothing in the way of lay preaching; the life of the people carries a more or less pietistic cast, from which it follows that Lutheran life and doctrine are not a little endangered from this side. Obscuring of the doctrine of justification, weakening of the sacraments, especially of baptism, and disparagement of the preaching office are faults of Pietism. The danger — and with some, alas, one can no longer speak merely of danger — and the ruin is all the greater since, from without as well, the seduction of Reformed sects, such as the Methodists, is added. This seduction is so very dangerous because, given the wide extent of religious freedom in Norway, every sect except the Mormons, as well as the Roman church, is permitted to intrigue at will within the Lutheran congregations. Zealotry and repulsion accomplish nothing here. What is needed is to instruct, to guide, to bear with, to confess freely and steadfastly, and to suffer for the truth. Several more zealous, more vigorous pastors, the spread of sound Lutheran writings, above all the writings of Luther himself, the crowding out of unhealthy fare, the bringing into use —