# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Juli 1860_S212 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 212 The So-Called Millennial Kingdom. our Lord Jesus Christ will come at the Last Day, to judge, and will raise all the dead, will give the believing and elect eternal life and eternal joy, but will condemn the godless people and the devils to hell and eternal punishment." Hence the objectionable thing in Chiliasm lies in this, that it overturns the boundaries set by Scripture between the two worlds, the old and the new, in that it teaches a resurrection before the resurrection, a kingdom of glory before the Last Day. But that much it has in common with the cruder Chiliasm even in its refined form. It can hardly be meant in earnest when it has been said*): "Our doctrine of the millennial kingdom is not the Chiliasm condemned by the Augustana, for the latter places the thousand years before the resurrection, whereas we place them after the resurrection." It is plain that the resurrection meant in the Augsburg Confession is the general resurrection at the Last Day known to the Church. We are not of the opinion that with this clarification of our Church's basic confession against Chiliasm the matter is settled for good. But this much seems clear to us: that the zeal with which Chiliasm is now not infrequently brought into the pulpit in southern and western Germany oversteps the bounds of a legitimate churchly freedom and thus works toward the dissolution of the Church. The minister will always be bound, in the exercise of his office, to respect the confession of the Church so long as the Church itself has not altered it. But let us pursue further the course of history. In the further course of the sixteenth century and to the end of the seventeenth, the doctrine of the millennial kingdom found favor in the Lutheran territories only among a series of otherwise notorious false teachers and fanatics — so with the Arian Joh. Erasmi, with the melancholy enthusiast Ezechiel Meth, with the Rosicrucians. Even in the Reformed Church it remained an isolated occurrence when a noted theologian, Joh. Piscator, the author of the most widely used German Reformed translation of the Bible, maintained that "the martyrs alone would rise before the general resurrection and reign a thousand years with Christ in heaven." The matter took a new turn when Spener, in the year 1692, published his "Assertion of the Hope of Better Times." In it he professed himself a Chiliast, but after his own fashion, in a more refined form, and in such a way that he blunted it as much as possible and sought to take away its offensiveness. He confined himself to maintaining that the thousand years of the Apocalypse were still future and that a glorious state of the Church was to be hoped for — an assertion for which churchly theology offered a significant handle, inasmuch as it still held fast to the view that the Babylon of the Apocalypse, the woman who sits upon many waters, was papal Rome. If this is so, then the ten kings who destroy the woman must still be future, and likewise the thousand years which follow only upon Christ's victory over the ten kings. (?) This consequence, to which churchly theo-