# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_April 1860_S121 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) On the Questions of the Day. 121 election (ἐκλογή, choice) which it obtains (v. 7), of the fullness of its number coming in (v. 12), of a grafting-in of the natural branches into their own olive tree (v. 24), of a being-saved of all Israel (v. 26) — all of which points simply and solely to the attainment of salvation in Christ, but not also to a "priestly" calling for the Gentiles. That is not to be found in v. 12 either. The "riches" praised here, which are only to be increased through the fullness of Israel's number, are elsewhere, after all, the same riches here and there, and thus are brought about here and there in the same way; therefore, if there only through the mission-work of the few, so here too only through the same work of the many. But when the author himself must confess that "the chosen people has, by and large, not fulfilled its calling," and has been "rejected" by God, and yet nevertheless thinks that upon the final fulfillment of the priestly calling of this people rejected by God depends the ultimate fulfillment of the great divine plan of salvation — that the redemptive work which the Son of God, rejected by this people, nonetheless accomplished for the salvation of the whole world despite this rejection, Christ's dearly-won, all-sufficiently efficacious merit, and his work of redemption endowed with all saving power, must nevertheless, for its final completion, wait upon the priestly assistance of this very people that rejected him; and that there remains for this people now still, besides the return to salvation in Christ, the being grafted back into their own olive tree, the "overflowing riches of his grace" — something still higher, more exalted, apart, which was properly intended for this people, not in Christ, but in a certain sense before him, and must now come to fulfillment, merely so that what was won and wrought through Christ, who appeared in the fullness of time — that overflowing riches of the divine grace revealed in Christ Jesus — may, for such persons who in any case already, even without that, are "no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, kings and priests before God" (Rev. 1:6), come into the perfected exercise of glory: or if the work of salvation of Christ is thus to be made dependent upon the entrance of a people, as such, into a certain position — and thus always upon human dependency — then we confess that this goes against not only our whole Christian understanding, but also against the total impression forced upon us by the entire Scripture. But it will not otherwise be provable either; the author has at least not proved it. Neither has Dr. Auberlen, to whom he appeals, nor Baumgarten, whom he likewise (though with a certain regret) brings in. Nor, either, with the reproach of a "spiritualism, working into the hands of unbelief, that dissolves everything away," which the author (p. 83) raises against those who, following the example of Christ, who says, "if you were Abraham's children, you would do Abraham's works" (John 8:39), and of the apostle, who teaches, "they are not all Israel who are of Israel" (Rom. 9:6), see in Israel only the Israel of promise, the Israel which the election concluded in Christ, and