# The Lutheran Pioneer_St. Louis_1929_S35 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 34 THE LUTHERAN PIONEER. Luther’s Small Catechism and Missions. Every missionary beginning work in a foreign country at once takes up the study of the country’s language, so that he may translate the Scriptures into that language. This is a tremendous task, since so many ideas must be expressed for which these languages have no proper terms and words. Lutheran missionaries generally prepare the way for the Bible by giving a translation of Luther’s Small Catechism into the hands of the people among whom they are working. As it is so much smaller in content than the whole Bible or even the New Testament, the single missionary finds the translation of the Small Catechism more equal to his ability and far more quickly accomplished. For this reason, Pastor John Campanius, the first Lutheran as well as the first Protestant mis- sionary to the American Indians, soon after he had come to the Delaware Indians in 1643 to preach the Gospel to them, set about translating Luther’s Small Catechism into their language. And it was thus that Luther’s Small Catechism was the first book to be translated into the language of the American Indian. Campanius worked here in America among his fellow-Swedes and the Indians until failing health compelled him to return to Sweden in 1648. - While we cannot to-day say how many Indians were taught the plain and simple Catechism truths, we do know that the faithful work of Campanius made a deep and lasting impression upon the native Americans, and the light of eternity will no doubt reveal much blessing brought to the Indians by the teaching of Lmuther’s Small Catechism through Campanius. Lutheran missionaries have used Luther’s Small Catechism in many foreign lands. In various parts - of Africa; Luther’s Catechism has brought the saving knowledge of Christ to many former heathen. In China our missionaries use a translation of the Small Catechism prepared by Rev. E. L. Arndt. In India our missionaries regularly use Tamil and Malayalam translations of Luther’s Catechism in their work. In short, I believe it may be said _ without fear of contradiction that Lutheran mis- _ sionaries, wherever they may work, base their educa- _ tional work upon Luther’s Small Catechism. And the result is most gratifying, as a few instances may help to show. i : A Theft and Its Sequel. : An orphanage in India. A circle of boys, with Cornelius in the center. Cor- ery dejected mien, for he has been - shown up to be a thief. He has stolen pencils from his schoolmates ; a whole nestful of them were found buried under a tree near the compound. His school- mates are taking him to task. “Did you learn to steal here in the orphanage? Repeat the Seventh Commandment.” They would not let him go till he had promised never to steal again. Such was the result of the teaching of the Small Catechism. Weeks passed. ‘The court scene described above was forgotten, when little Cornelius gave the mis- sionary a joyful surprise. Through the curtained door could be heard a child’s voice on the veranda. The child, it seemed, was repeating a lesson it had learned by heart. Now and then the mumbling of a man’s voice could be heard, saying, “Good!” “Tine!” “Very good!” The missionary recognized the man’s voice to be that of one of his old heathen servants, who was sitting on the veranda and doing some work. And the child was— Cornelius! He had come over from his quarters in the school at that late hour to tell the old heathen the Bible story they had heard in school that day. The former thief had become a missionary of his own volition. A Heathen Beginning, but a Christian Ending. - A Hindu boy and a Christian had gotten into a quarrel, with the result that they had disfigured each other’s faces with crayon. Besides this, the Christian boy, the more temperamental of the two, had poured a bottle of ink over the linen shirt of his opponent. The Hindu boy went to the principal and complained of the shameful treatment he claimed to have received at the hands of the Chris- tian boy. The investigation was without any satis- factory results, since neither of the two wanted to admit that he had begun the quarrel. Finally the principal gave this verdict: “As far as disfiguring each other’s faces with the crayon is concerned, you are alike guilty; but you, Barnabas” (this was the name of the Christian boy), “will have to pay for the shirt you have spoiled.” The Hindu demanded half a rupee. : Immediately after the recitation the other Hindu boys told him: “You are a fool! You should have demanded three times as much as you did.” And, sure enough, the next morning the Hindu boy ap- peared at the principal’s office and declared that his guardian demanded one and a half rupee. When ‘Barnabas heard of this demand, he was incensed at the demand. The principal brought the argument to an end by saying: “Barnabas will give you the price first agreed upon. If you cannot buy a new shirt for that amount, we shall get you one.”