# The Lutheran Pioneer_St. Louis_1887_S14 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 14 The Lutheran Pioneer. Is There a Real Presence in the Holy Supper? Christ says there is, and we teach that his body and blood are truly present under the form of bread and wine, and are communicated to those who participate in the Lord’s Supper. It is just here that most of the doctrinal differences arise as to this holy sacrament. The feast that should have been the bond of union among Christians has become through the evil one an apple of discord. Satan has always tried to cheat men out of great blessings by darkening God’s word and misrepresenting his promises. God plainly for- bade our first parents to eat of a certain tree in Eden. Satan wishing to raise doubts, whis- pered, ‘‘ Yea, hath God said ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?’’ God spake from heaven clearly affirming: ‘‘This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”’ Satan in that great temptation boldly said: ‘‘Zf thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.’’ And when Jesus, almost in his dying hour, said to his disciples: ‘«Take, eat, this is my body, také, drink, this is my blood,’’ does it not seem like Satan’s old device to hear the suggestion: ‘Did Christ really mean what he said?”’ ‘‘How could he; he only meant to say ‘this represents my body, this is a sym- bol of my blood!’”’ Now, if these words were dark or equiv- ocal; if they had been spoken in haste or by a thoughtless, impulsive man, we might have put some other meaning into them. But they are the words, the solemn test- amentary words of God himself. and are ~ so plain, so clear, so simple that they can- not be plainer, clearer, or more simple. A child can understand them, but no an- gel dare change them, no creature has any authority to expound them otherwise than as they read. What other language could Christ have used We admit that Christ is not an ordinary door, | of virtue in a sinful world. Beware! You are but the spiritual—but no less actual and real— entrance into his kingdom. Christ say that by the body and blood He only | means a spiritual, figurative body and blood? | It is against this very error that the words of | Christ guard, for He says, ‘‘ Take, eat, this is | my body which is broken for you,” ‘Take and | drink, this is my blood which is shed for you.’? | Christ’s real, substantial body was given for | us, not a figure of it. His true life’s blood, not spiritual blood, delivered us from sin. St. Paul, to whom was granted a special revelation upon this most vital point, is very clear in enforcing the above truth. Writing to the Corinthians he says: ‘‘The cup of blessing, which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?”’ What he intended to teach is freed from all doubt by his following words in another place: ‘Wherefore, whosoever shall eat of this bread ‘He is Risen.”’ and drink of this cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.”’ Then the body of the Lord is present, for unworthiness in eating and disrespect to a treading on dangerous ground. ‘If any man But where does | shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.’’ The Workman. The Hope of a Better Life. By Dr. Martin Luther. If there were no hope of the resurrection of the dead nor of another and better world, after this short and miserable life, wherefore then doth God offer Himself that He will be our God, that He will give us all that is necessary and healthful for us, and in the end will de- liver us out of all trouble both temporal and spiritual? To what purpose is it that we hear His Word and believe in Him? What are we the better when we cry and sigh to Him in our anguish and need, that we wait with patience upon His comfort and salvation, upon His grace and benefits which He shows in Christ? Why do we praise and thank Him for the same? Why are we daily in danger, and suffer ourselves to be persecuted and slain for the sake of Christ’s Word, which we teach and hold for our greatest treasure, and do acknowledge it before the wicked world! But forasmuch as the everlasting merci- ful God, only through His Word and Sac- raments, talketh and dealeth with us (all other creatures excluded), not of temporal things which pertain to this vanishing life, all which in the beginning He hath pro- vided richly for us, but where we shall remain when we depart from hence, and giveth unto us His Son for a Saviour, who delivereth us from sin and death, and hath purchased for us everlasting righteousness, life, and salvation; that we believe in Him, and at His commandment are bap- tized, etc. Therefore it is most certain that we do not die away like the beasts that have no understanding; but so many of us that do to express this mystery: Consider, if a per- gon were to hand you a cup, without stating explicitly that there was anything in it, say- ing, ‘‘Take, drink, this is wine,’’ could we understand the words to mean anything else than that there is wine in the cup, that the 4 wine is offered to usin and at the same time with the cup, and that we are to drink the sleep in Christ, shall through Him be raised again to life everlasting at the last day; but the ungodly to everlasting shame and de- struction. little bread and wine would not incur such a penalty as that spoken of in another place, for St. Paul says, ‘‘He that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.” We cannot evade the fact, nor do we desire to, that in, with and under the bread and wine ~~ +9 0 + The Place for Luther’s Catechism. same. Would it not be a piece of mockery if the cup really contained no wine? Now can we, dare we believe that the dying Redeemer only wished to mock his disciples and His whole Church, when handing bread He said, ‘‘ Take, eat, this is my body,’ and extending the cup, said, ‘‘Take, drink, this is my blood’’? Christ gave and the disciples received His true body and blood. ' There are some who try to escape the force of this plain statement by saying that Christ calls Himself the door, the vine, a rock, and as we are to take these figuratively, so with the words ‘‘this is my body, this is my blood,” the body and blood of Christ is given to and received by each communicant at the table of the Lord. And, let us ask, where, if any one is allowed to change or twist or explain away these solemn words, where will a halt be called? If one has a right to explain Christ’s clear words ‘‘ this is my body,”’ into this represents or symbolizes my body, why has not another the same right to so change the word of God where it posi- tively asserts that Christ is the Son of God, that he is the Saviour of the world, as to teach that Christ only represents what a son of God should be, or he symbolizes the saving power “And this I say for myself. I also am a doctor and a preacher, yea, as learned and ex- perienced as all who have such presumption and security. Yet I do asa child who is being taught the catechism. Every morning and whenever I have time I read and say, word for word, the Ten Commandments, the Creed, the Lord’s Prayer, the Psalms, etc., and I must still read and study daily, and yet I cannot master it as I wish, but must remain, and that too gladly, a child and pupil of the catechism.” —Inither.