# The Lutheran Pioneer_St. Louis_1881_S26 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) The Lutheran Pioneer. The English Bible. One of our young readers requests us to ‘‘ tell him in a few words something about King James's Bible and the New Version.”” We gladly comply with the request of our young friend. KING JAMES’S BIBLE. Our common English Bible is called King James's Bible, because it was issued in England by authority of King James I., in the year 1611. In 1604, the proposal to revise the Eng- lish translations of the Bible was made at a conference held by James I. at Hampton Court. No real opposition being offered to the proposal, the king sketched out a plan to be adopted. He ‘‘wished that some special pains should be taken in that behalf for one uniform translation, and this to be done by the best learned in both universities (Oxford and Cambridge); after them to be revised by the bishops and the chief learned of the Church; from them to be pre- sented to the Privy Council; and lastly, to be ratified by his royal authority. And so this whole Church to be bound upon it, and none other.’” According to this plan the English translation of the Bible was prepared by forty- seven eminent scholars of King James's time; and this translation has until now been recog- nized as the ‘‘Authorized Version,’’ wherever the English language is spoken. THE NEW VERSION. In 1870, a Convocation of the Church of England thought it “desirable that a revision of the Authorized Version of the Holy Scrip- tures be undertaken.’’ Two committees, con- sisting of English and American scholars, were formed for this purpose. The ‘‘ Committee for the Revision of the Old Testament’’ has not yet completed its work; but the work of the *¢New Testament Committee’? was published in the month of May, and this is the “New Version’’ of which our young friend has ‘‘ heard so much during the past weeks.’’ It can be had at a very low price at the book-stores, and our friend can see for himself wherein it differs from the one now in use. The changes do not affect a single doctrine of God’s Word; still the wisdom of many of those changes is fairly questioned by eminent scholars, both in Eng- Jand and America, and it is very doubtful whether this ‘‘ New Version”’ will ever take the place of ‘‘King James's Bible,’ which has been in use for more than two centuries and a half, and which has struck deep root in the hearts and memories of the English speaking people. The old readers of the Bible at least will be of ‘Old Aunt Nancy’s” mind: «¢¥or ten years past, and for five times ten At the back of that, my dear, I've made and mended and toiled and saved, : With my Bible ever near, : _ Sometimes it was only a verse at morn, _ hat lifted me up from care, : Like the springing wings of a swecet-voiced lark _ Cleaving the golden air; “‘And sometimes on Sunday afternoons ’Twas a chapter rich and long, That came to my heart in its weary hour With the lift of a triumph song. I studied the precious words, my dear, When a child at my mother’s knee, And I tell you the Bible I’ve always had Is a good enough book for me. “T may be stubborn and out of date, But my hair is white as snow, And I love the things I learned to love In the beautiful long ago. I cannot be changing at my time; ’Twould be losing a part of myself. You may lay the new New Testament Away on the upper shelf. “T cling to the one my good man read In our fireside prayers at night; To the one my little children lisped Ere they faded out of my sight, I shall gather my dear ones close again Where the many mansions be, And till then the Bible I’ve always had Is a good enough book for me.”’ (For the ‘‘Lutheran Pioneer’’.) Christ, the Model of a true Pastor. By Rev. H. Hanser. I. HOW THE GATHERED CONGREGATION IS TO BE GUIDED. Let us learn from Christ, the good Shepherd, how a gathered congregation is to be guided. How did the good Shepherd guide His congre- gation? We answer: With His Word. He did not use any external means of constraint, but only precept and instruction. He not only taught on the Sabbath, but also during the week; He made use of every opportunity which presented itself. Moreover, He not only taught, but also listened to what His disciples had to say, and with endless patience led them more and more, so far, that God’s Word alone governed their lives, and became the light upon their path which they followed. He guided His followers with God’s Word. He gives no rules of an order, does not insist upon strict external observance of the Sabbath, of such things, and become outwardly, in ap- pearance, pious, without having in reality been converted. In terrible blindness they may soon say; I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing,’’ while the Lord’s true judgment is to this effect: ‘“Thou knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind and naked; .. . anoint thine eyes with eye-salve, that thou mayest see!’’ On the contrary, it is important according to the model of Christ to relinquish such out- ward signs, to refer the congregation to the renewal from within, and if this be done slowly, to restrain himself as a patient shepherd, but not wish to ripen fruit, which before God is worthless, by means of external regulations and by urging with any law. Another thing. Nowadays, the temptation to organize associations within the congregation, and to comprise everything in constitutions and regulations, is not wanting. But how did the good Shepherd act in this respect? He could easily haye made various good regulations, and the people, following Him as they did in crowds, would gladly have observed them. How ensily could He have regulated their service; but He does not do so. It is always His congregation, as such, from which He de- sires acts of love;* for instance, when the people were hungry in the desert, He says to His poor congregation : ‘‘Give ye them to eat,’’ and when she gave her five loaves, He gave her twelve baskets in return, that she might not grow weary of and become discouraged in such works. Therefore let us have no such associations, through which the congregation’s obligation is removed from view, through which the lack of true brotherly love is concealed more than exposed, and through which the Christian’s giving out of free will is not ad- vanced, but the longer the more, is converted into an act of constraint. Every society, through which the congregation is deprived of its obligation to provide for the poor, the needy widows and orphans, for church and school, comes of evil. According to the model of the good Shep- herd, it is also necessary to the proper guidance of the congregation, to pray diligently for the same to Him, who guides the hearts of all. We are frequently told of the Lord Jesus, that He prayed for His followers, and we see how nor upon fasting, and gives no external sign of| He bears them before His Heavenly Father distinction; He rather cautioned them against such outward appearances with these words: “The kingdom of Heaven cometh not with ob- servation.’’ He could have put Himself and His congregation in a favorable light before the people and the Pharisees by strictly observing such matters; but He does not do so. Much is to be learned from this. For a pastor is often tempted to represent his congre- gation as faring well, even when it is new and not well founded. This can then be done most quickly and easily, when certain external regu- lations, works, ceremonies, etc., are especially recommended. The people eagerly take hold from His prayer, John 17., where He prays: ‘Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom Thou hast given me, that they may be one, .as we are.” It is, therefore, the duty of the true under- shepherds of Christ, frequently to commit to God in prayer and supplication, the souls con- fided to their care, and in all difficult circum- stances and occurrences to beseech God fer- vently, that He may control and guide -the minds of the congregation, as it pleases Him. In that way they will accomplish more than with faint-hearted care and fear. ——s-+e- oo