# Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1958_S41 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Lutheran Synodical Conference, :1958 41 it speaks and that through Scripture God speaks clearly to us on all matters of faith and life; 2. that we declare our willingness without equivocation and evasion to come to grips with all the issues that have arisen between us; 3. that we declare our firm intention to expose and condemn all matters contrary to the Word of God in doctrine and life with the purpose of removing what is not in keeping with the Word of God. 4. (adopted at a later meeting) that in this connection, and for ._ the foregoing reasons, we declare our conviction that a joint — doctrinal statement needs to aim at nothing less than full agreement in all matters of doctrine and in practice which is based on such doctrine. To approach this large and vital common task intelligently, it was necessary to have a clear understanding of the precise points. at issue in the various problems that have disturbed, and are still disturbing, the unity of spirit within the Synodical Con- ference. To this end the group committed itself to an exhaustive study of the following six areas of theology: . Scripture — Revelation, Principles of Interpretation . Atonement and Justification , . Grace, Conversion, Election . The Dynamic of the Christian Life — Scouting . Church and Ministry — Fellowship, Unionism, Separatism, Discipline, Military Chaplaincy 6. Eschatology — Antichrist To facilitate discussion, these areas were combined into three, as follows: 1. Atonement, Justification, and the dynamic, or motivating power, for the Christian life, with practical application to the question of Scouting. 2. Scripture (Revelation, Principles of Interpretation, Open Ques- tions) and the practical application to the question of fulfill- ment of Biblical prophecy in history, as, for example, in the doctrine of Antichrist. 3. Grace, Conversion, Election, and Church and Ministry, with practical application to questions of fellowship, unionism, sep- aratism, church discipline, and the military chaplaincy. Having established this program, the task of preparing special studies on these topics was distributed among a number of sub- committees composed of members from each synod. The procedure in subsequent meetings was to present the views of each synod’s representatives in a given area, to give exhaustive discussion to the individual essays, to suggest changes and emendations, and then to recommit the materials to the respective subcommittees for the production of a single document on the question at issue for the purpose of giving expression to a common consensus, or agreement, of all constituent synods. No less than five plenary meetings totalling fourteen days of work have been conducted. Thus far areas-one .and two of the above-listed three groups were thoroughly discussed. No. effort was spared to come to an understanding of where we agree and Tr WD