# Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1950_S61 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) o | Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1950 61 Our message and ways attract the coming generation, the more educated. But the question is: “You have a message, but where is your building?” Recently, one of our members took the pastor home in his car. He also carried a couple with whom he had an engagement. Later on, he advised: “Don’t send them a ‘Messenger.’ They are just waiting for the church. Sending a ‘Messenger’ might do more harm than good right now. They don’t want to be pushed into rented rooms.” The Free Methodist mission has been thoroughly examined. A long discussion with its director and his wife indicated that they are very much discouraged with the slow work. They do have about 60 children in school. Most of them get to church off and on, but “we have only about three old women who come to service beside the children — and many of those still belong to other de- nominations — though we are gaining among them.” Other small organizations have been examined. All experience the same problem. From our investigations it can be said that work will continue to be slow as long as we have no building of our own. When we do get one, it will be highly inadvisable to put one off the main streets. This is the Free Methodist mistake. If at all possible, a school should be started. It will be a drawing card and a feeder. We have spent hours attempting to work out a vacation Bible school, but space is difficult to find unless one desires to start some- thing far away from our present location, in a shack. The housing project, recently started, has wiped out hundreds of homes, and all vacant space is at a premium. We attempted religious instruc- tion at the Day Nursery, in which we are holding services, but the children were too small to work with at all. We discussed the matter again with the director. She now has the Nursery on its feet and has set an age limit because she has more children than her charter allows. So we intend to reinstitute work among the children: shortly. Obstacles to our growth were change of location and hour of worship. For a year we have now been in one location. If we can retain it until we build, we shall be very fortunate and entrench ourselves more firmly in the community. Other obstacles were the constant worry of the missionary about his own housing con- ditions, which were most unstable until recently. If a chapel is built on a main street in the colored community, it is our opinion, after much study of the matter, that a parsonage be located near by. It is definitely feasible and advisable for the welfare of our work. A car — toward which the pastor is working now — will be a great help. Occasionally a car has been available, and four times as much work was accomplished with half as much strain. Our’ trolley transportation is far from the best. Despite the many handicaps, we have $238.91 in our building fund and about $75 in our Sunday school treasury and some $5.00 in a special fund. We have paid our own way in everything but pastor’s salary and rent. Toward his expense account Holy Cross has contributed, in the past year and a half, $10 a month. From $5.00 a month we have jumped to $24 a quarter to the Missionary Board, plus mission-festival offerings. Our good Lord blessing us, we hope to build in this area as He gives us strength and ability. For this purpose your prayers are entreated. Geo. C. Derwic, Pastor