# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_Juli 1858_S217 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) The Theological Faculty at Jena. 217 takes essentially the same position. The whole movement of theology and church in the last forty years has essentially been ignored by this school. Not progress but standstill is its banner. — On one side of their banner stands "Progress," on the other: "Scientific Rigor." We do not deny that among the older and newer rationalists there have been, and still are, many very learned men who have deserved well of scholarship; but rationalism as such — its basic doctrines concerning God and man, concerning revelation and reason, concerning Scripture and church — we charge with a want of scientific rigor, whether it appeals now to sound common sense or to the results of the latest philosophical inquiries. And remarkably, it is not only we who bring this charge against it, but a still-living, distinguished member of that very Jena faculty, Prof. Carl Hase, raised it publicly more than twenty years ago in his theological polemical writings and grounded it most tellingly. Hase, to be sure, replies that he meant only rationalismus vulgaris, common rationalism; but now his own colleague Rückert rises up against this and declares openly to the world: "common and uncommon rationalism — we still find ourselves in the same essential position as for a hundred years!" Now if common and speculative rationalism are essentially the same, and if the former has been shown by its own disciples to lack scientific rigor, then the latter at least should not have the effrontery to claim the predicate of scientific rigor for itself alone. "By their fruits ye shall know them." What have been the fruits, for the church and for the life of the people, of the movement that arose a hundred years ago and in which the theological faculty at Jena still stands today, and stands alone? Whoever stands in the midst of the people and knows them, knows it, and it forces itself upon him daily: rationalism has laid waste the church, broken its ordinances, thereby thrown the people into confusion, taken from them love for the church, for piety, for prayer, and with that destroyed the foundation of all fidelity and all virtues; whatever good and Christian remains among the people still stems from the remnants of the old faith. This judgment sounds harsh, and may sound especially harsh to learned gentlemen who bury themselves in their books and often know precious little of the real conditions among the people. Let us therefore hear a man who, for all his learning, knows well the life of the German people in the old world and the new, and who has thought and written much about it — a Swiss republican by birth, by no means a confessional but a very "liberal-minded" theologian, the professor of theology at the evangelical seminary at Mercersburg in Pennsylvania, Dr. Schaff. He writes, in his book that appeared only this year,