# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_August 17 2000_S3 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Question 1: “Can a District of the Synod ‘call’ a pastor to serve as the executive of an independent corporation which is not a congregation or a recognized service organization of the Synod or an entity of the Synod?” Opinion: The Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod do not specifically state that a District may issue a “call.” However, the Bylaws do give recognition to such calls. Bylaw 4.71, 3, speaks of ordained and commissioned ministers who are members of the Synod and are called or appointed to serve the Synod. Bylaw 2.15, f, specifically states, in the case of missionaries, “…including a call by a District.” Thus, a District may extend a call. Having concluded that a District may extend a call, the question then is whether such a call may be made to a pastor to serve as the executive of an independent corporation which is not a congregation, nor a Recognized Service Organization (RSO) or an entity of the Synod. Article XII, 12, of the Constitution of the Synod states: “The Districts are independent in the administration of affairs which concern their District only, it being understood, however, that such administration shall always serve the interests of the Synod.” Thus the requirement is established that a District can take an independent action if: (1) the action relates to an activity which only affects that District, and (2) the activity serves the best interests of the Synod. Bylaw 4.07, e, states: “Jurisdiction with respect to everything which is administered by or for the entire Synod resides in the Synod itself,….” Whether or not the activity of the independent corporation only concerns the District which issued the call and whether the activity of the independent corporation serves the interests of the Synod are questions of fact which are beyond the authority of the Commission. Question 2: “Can a man who has received and accepted such a call remain on the roster of the Synod?” Opinion: (The Commission assumes that the question is whether the man can remain an active member of the Synod as that term is defined in Bylaw 2.15.) Bylaw 2.15 sets forth various positions which would qualify an ordained or commissioned minister of religion as an active member of the Synod. The only category which fits the position described in question #1 is found in Bylaw 2.15, h, namely, engaged in a “…specialized ministry endorsed by the Synod, including endorsement by one of its Districts.” The words “or other specialized ministry” were added to Bylaw 2.15, h, by Resolution 5-11 (Overture 512) of the 1989 convention of the Synod, entitled “To Amend Miscellaneous Bylaws.” The “Resolved” of this resolution stated: “To amend Bylaw 2.15 h to allow for directors of Christian education to serve in an official civil service position with the military and remain an “active member” of the Synod as well as to provide for active status for others involved in specialized ministries….” Neither the Convention Workbook nor the Convention Proceedings elaborate further on the term “specialized ministry.” Bylaw 2.15, h, further requires the specialized ministry to be endorsed by the Synod and/or a District. The Council of Presidents addresses this issue in its Policy Manual where it states: Consequently, the Council of Presidents has declared that the word “endorsement” as used in Bylaw 2.15, h, shall mean “an ecclesiastical statement that affirms that the person receiving the endorsement has been determined by the Synod to be fit for the ministry and that acknowledges that the position to be filled is a Word or Word/Sacrament ministry.” The Commission accepts this definition. Therefore, to answer the question whether this man in question may remain on the roster of the Synod under Bylaw 2.15, h, it must be determined whether the independent corporation is a specialized ministry and whether the position qualifies for endorsement by a District. These are factual determinations beyond the authority of the Commission. 174