# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_September 14 1999_S8 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) convention, and reaffirmed in conventions which followed. Since ultimate responsibility as spiritual head of the institution remains with the President of the institution, even though that responsibility is delegated, any other ruling under the present bylaws and resolutions of the Synod would be impossible to sustain…. It is the opinion of the Commission that until the Synod clearly indicates that the term, “spiritual head,” does not involve the President of the institution in the distinctive functions of the pastoral office and/or exercising authority over men in spiritual matters, its decision is consistent with the position adopted by previous conventions. In response to the current question, the Commission therefore answers that because current Bylaw 6.12 retains the content and terminology of the Bylaw 6.15 referred to in the 1984 opinion, including the requirement that a President of an institution serve as its “spiritual head,” the 1984 ruling of the Commission stands because it was never overruled by a synodical convention. 60. Question Re the Eligibility of Called Teachers to Vote in Voters’ Assemblies (99-2161) A pastor of the Synod in an August 10 letter posed the following question to the Secretary of the Synod: [A statement in our school’s faculty handbook] reads, “Called teachers at our school are members of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (sic)…. As members of synod, not the congregation, they are not eligible to vote in the voter’s assembly.” This has never been my understanding. There are of course times when it is prudent for a called worker to choose not to vote, but I find nothing in the handbook of the Synod that would prohibit called teachers from voting. Please consider my request that you research this matter. If satisfactory information is not available, please ask the CCM to render an opinion. Response: The Commission replies that there are no provisions in the Constitution or Bylaws of The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod that prohibit individual members of the Synod from also holding voting membership in a congregation that is a Synod member. Article II of the Bylaws addresses membership in the Synod. Nothing in that Article in any way prohibits individual members of the Synod from also being voting members of their local congregation. The Commission recognizes that congregations are autonomous and self-governing (Constitution Article II; Bylaw 8.11). A congregation could therefore limit who may vote in its voters’ assembly. However, the passage from the faculty handbook quoted above is based on an incorrect premise about the interplay of Synod membership and congregation membership. 61. Clarification of Articles II, VI, and XIII and Bylaws 1.09, 2.27, and 2.39 Re False Doctrine, Suspension, and Expulsion (99-2162) In an August 17, 1999, letter to the Commission, a pastor of the Synod addressed specific questions to the Commission regarding the suspension and expulsion of a member of the Synod who embraces and persists in false doctrine. This matter was assigned to a Commission member for the drafting of a response. 62. Question Re Suspension of a Pastor and Request for Clarification of “Shall” in Article XIII of the Constitution (99-2163) In a letter dated August 20, 1999, a pastor inquires regarding latitude and discretion on the part of a District President in the suspension of a pastor. This matter was assigned to a Commission member for the drafting of a response. 63. Questions Re Interaction between Bylaws 2.27 and 6.47 when Charges are Brought against a Member of a Faculty (99-2164)