# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_August 17 18 2018_S15 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) professional church workers of the Synod, and others desiring a Christian liberal arts education by facilitating prior approval as set forth in Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 for theology appointments to college/university faculties and by coordinating the activities of the Synod’s colleges and universities as a unified system of the Synod through their respective boards of regents. The authority and process delineated in Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 (adopted 2016, Proceedings, pp. 178–9) clearly places under the purview of this prior approval all manner of appointments and calls related to theological teaching responsibilities, with a single exception (italicized): 3.10.6.7.3 All initial appointments to persons serving on theology faculties, or teaching classes in or cross-listed with the theology department, shall require prior approval by a majority vote of the President of the Synod (or his designee), the chairman of the Council of Presidents (or his designee), and a member of the Concordia University System board selected by the chair, and shall include a thorough theological review. The three voters shall be ordained. The process shall be facilitated by the president of Concordia University System. Initial appointment refers to the initial engagement of any person to teach one or more theology courses, regardless of assigned academic department, other than faculty who teach theology courses no more than one academic year in any three-year period. 2016 Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 thus—like the corresponding seminary prior approval bylaw, Bylaw 3.10.5.7.3 (a)— requires approval for “all initial appointments,” whether full- or part-time. The bylaw does make exception for college and university faculty who teach theology courses no more than one academic year in any threeyear period. Though this provision was granted to give the broadest latitude to the individual school so that timely response may be given to changing conditions and non-traditional formats, it does not relieve the individual board of regents or the president of the school from their solemn responsibility to both the theological integrity of the classroom with respect to our confessional standard as a church (cf. Bylaw 3.10.6.7.2, which applies to all full- and part-time faculty, whether with theological teaching responsibilities or not) and to providing the highest quality education for the benefit of the student. Absent any other specific exception, the requirement for prior approval also applies to adjunct as well as full-time theological professors and the same process applies to both, and, by extension, to any other category of initial appointment of those who teach theological courses in a college or university within the CUS system. 164. Concordia University System Educational Arrangements with Other Church Bodies (18-2890) The President of the Concordia University System (CUS) posed questions of the commission, stating initially by way of background the following: Several of the Concordia universities have entered into or are contemplating an educational relationship with church bodies that are not in fellowship with the Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod. One university has announced that another church body, which ordains women, will recognize the university’s courses (Greek, Hebrew, Church history, etc.) as a portion of the church body’s pre-ministerial training. Similar arrangements are being considered by other universities, with other church bodies with which the Synod is not in fellowship, both Lutheran and Anglican. Response and discussion of “Background” material: Synod Bylaws 3.6.6.6 (a) and (b) require the CUS Board, in consultation with the colleges and universities of the Synod, to develop and have in place policies that would assist and ensure that those responsible for the educational programs of the institutions do so in a manner designed to “preserve their Lutheran identity” as relating to the Article III objectives of the Synod’s Constitution. These objectives grow out of the CCM Minutes – August 17–18, 2018 – Page 136