# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_April 6 7 2018_S11 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) • Section I, Page 1, #3: The sentence, “Four laypersons shall be appointed by the Board of Regents in a non-convention year,” seems to be a vestige of former bylaws; if not, its connection with the remainder is unclear. Perhaps four here is meant to be a minimum, as on Page 2. • The list of members needs to be updated according to LCMS Bylaw 3.10.6.2. • Note the prohibition (if any additional board members are appointed in convention years) of Bylaw 3.2.4 [g], that no appointments may be made in the interim between the election of new regents and their assumption of office, either in a Synod or a district convention year. • The board must meet at least quarterly or obtain approval from the President of the Synod (Bylaw 1.5.3). • Section I, Page 2: Note the requirement of Bylaw 3.10.6.2 [8], that appointees be approved as qualified by the Secretary of the Synod and President of CUS. • Under D, “A written ballot…,” the commission does not understand the procedure for election of “two candidates” or its relation to the broader process for election of four or more. • Section I, Page 5: Synod’s conflict of interest policies must be adhered to by every agency (Bylaw 1.5.2). • Section I, Page 7 and 9: The commission notes that the executive committee is granted expansive powers that seem to exceed those typically assigned to an executive committee (see limits imposed in LCMS Bylaw 1.5.3.2, which applies to CUSP as an agency of the Synod). • Section 1, Page 11: The commission notes that the president’s apparent authority to confirm chairmen of board committees, who, in addition, together comprise a significant portion of the executive committee, may present a substantial conflict, as the president serves under the governance of, and is responsible to, the board of regents. The commission has not reviewed the employee, faculty, and student handbooks referenced in toto, though it has made a cursory review of selected policies dealing with student-faculty grievances, employment grievances, and harassment, which did not include the appeal process required to be available to faculty challenging a termination decision. The commission notes that the board of regents and institution are required to develop policies exhaustive of the list required by the policies of the Concordia University System, at least inclusive of those topics listed in Bylaw 3.6.6.7. The noted handbooks and other policies of the university should be reviewed by the institution to ensure that all bylaw- and CUS-required policies are in place. 153. Northwest District Bylaws Proposed (18-2882) By a March 28 e-mail, the office of the Northwest District President sent the district’s bylaws, along with an overture (amending Bylaws 3.3.1 and 3.3.3–5, removing Bylaw 3.3.13, inserting a new Bylaw 3.4.5, and relocating Bylaws 3.3.11–12) intended to align the district’s bylaws with changes made at the 2016 LCMS convention, for prior review and approval by the commission. The commission’s review noted the following points requiring further attention: • • The wording of Bylaw 2.3.2 is of rather uncertain meaning, and should be replaced with the wording of LCMS Bylaw 4.1.1.2, that the “Bylaws of the Synod shall be primarily the bylaws of the district.” Bylaw section 2.4 does not adequately allow for the office of the district president, who is not merely part of the “district staff” that is under the administration and direction of the district’s board of directors. The district president is a constitutional officer of the district in his own right, with ecclesiastical supervisory responsibilities beyond the board’s purview and with duties owed directly to the convention, to the Synod as a whole, and to its President, in particular. The other CCM Minutes – April 6–7, 2018 – Page 118