# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_August 10 12 2012_S5 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Education also had the responsibility to grant prior approval for initial appointment of theological faculty at the Synod’s colleges and universities. Prior to the 2010 Synod convention, the Board for Pastoral Education had similar responsibility to grant prior approval for initial faculty at the Synod’s seminaries. Prior to the 2010 convention, the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance made recommendations to the Synod, many of which were adopted by the 2010 convention, to restructure the national office around two mission offices. Res. 8-08A eliminated the Board for University Education and the Board for Pastoral Education. Some of the responsibilities of the eliminated Board for University Education were given to the boards of regents of the colleges and universities and some were revised into the responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Concordia University System. No board other than the seminary boards of regents was given responsibilities for the seminaries. The responsibility to grant prior approval for initial appointments of seminary faculty members in any body other than the boards of regents of the seminaries was eliminated with the elimination of the Board for Pastoral Education (2007 “Handbook Convention Version,” p. 263 of 2010 Today’s Business). Prior to the changes of the 2010 convention, a parallel reference to the responsibility to grant prior approval of initial seminary faculties by the Board for Pastoral Education had also been placed in the bylaw section for seminary faculties (Bylaw 3.8.2.7.3, 2007 Handbook). This section was stricken in the 2007 “Handbook Convention Version” (p. 286 of 2010 Today’s Business). The responsibility to grant approval of initial theological faculty to the Synod’s colleges and universities was stricken from the text of the responsibilities transferred from what had been the Board for University Education to the Board of Directors of Concordia University System (2007 “Handbook Convention Version,” p. 256 of 2010 Today’s Business). This responsibility for prior approval of initial theological faculty at the Synod’s colleges and universities was then not included in the bylaws delineating the responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Concordia University System (Bylaw 3.6.6.5, 2010 Handbook). Prior to the changes of the 2010 convention, a parallel reference to the responsibility to grant prior approval of initial theological faculty by the Board for University Education had been placed in the bylaw section for college and university faculties (Bylaw 3.8.3.8.3, 2007 Handbook). This section (renumbered as 3.10.5.6.3 in the 2010 Handbook) did not get stricken in the 2007 “Handbook Convention Version,” (p. 297 of 2010 Today’s Business) and remains in the 2010 Handbook, with the exception that the reference to the Board for University Education was changed to the Board of Directors of Concordia University System. The responsibility to revise the Handbook of the Synod after a convention is that of the Commission on Handbook and the Commission on Constitutional Matters. Bylaw 3.9.4.2 (b) indicates: “In consultation with the Commission on Constitutional Matters, [the Commission on Handbook] shall revise the Handbook of the Synod immediately after each convention to bring it into harmony with the resolutions and changes adopted by the convention.” After the 2010 convention, the Commission on Handbook and the Commission on Constitutional Matters worked diligently to make sure the extensive changes made by the convention would be reflected in the 2010 Handbook. The problem brought to the Commission on Constitutional Matters by the Board of Directors of Concordia University System which had not been noted by the 2010 convention itself could have, indeed should have, been noted by one or both of those two commissions. It was not. Had it been, the inconsistency created by the two places in the Bylaws indicating the responsibility for prior approval of initial theological faculty at the Synod’s colleges and universities by the Board of Directors of Concordia University System could have been resolved earlier. Now that the inconsistency between the two references has been brought to the attention of this commission, this commission and the Commission on Handbook have the responsibility to resolve the inconsistency. 294