# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_October 31 November 1 2009_S4 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Concordia University Ann Arbor provide input regarding the question. The Secretary was also asked to request the member requesting the interpretation to confirm whether or not he/she had been appointed to a continuing level faculty position (Bylaw 3.8.3.8.2) and whether or not he/she had been terminated from that position pursuant to Bylaw 3.8.3.8.7. 124. Interpretation of Constitution Article XIV re Proposing Amendments (09-2566) In a September 24, 2009 e-mailed letter, the chairman of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance, speaking on behalf of the task force, requested an interpretation of the words “each proposed change shall be voted on separately” in paragraph 2 of Article XIV of the Constitution of the Synod. Question: Since the task force has several constitutional changes which it will be presenting to the 2010 convention, and some of those related, does each change, no matter how small, have to be presented and voted on separately? Opinion: Amendments to the Constitution are governed by Article XIV, paragraphs 2 and 3: 2. All proposed changes and amendments must be submitted in writing to the Synod assembled in convention, and each proposed change shall be voted on separately. A two-thirds majority of all votes cast shall be necessary for adoption. 3. After adoption by the convention, such amendments shall be submitted to the congregations of the Synod by means of three announcements in the official periodical within three months after the close of the convention. In researching past opinions of the Commission on Constitutional Matters, the commission noted that the issue raised by this question has never been previously considered. Prior to 1917, the Constitution of the Synod allowed amendments without reference to the phrase under consideration. Therefore, the commission has looked at the practice of the Synod since 1917, such practice reflecting the sense and intent of the Synod since that time. As recently as the 2004 convention, the Synod considered and acted on two constitutional amendments. Resolution 7-21 sought to amend a single article of the Constitution, Article XI F 2. The second, Resolution 5-04A, sought to add directors of family life ministry to the list of those eligible for membership in the Synod. In doing so, the resolution called for amendments in Articles V, VI, and XII. In view of the foregoing, the commission finds that the phrase “each proposed change shall be voted on separately” may be properly interpreted in at least two ways. First, all changes to a single article can be submitted as a single change. Because, by reason of the structure of the Constitution, each article intentionally deals with a single subject, all amendments to a single article may always be considered a single change. Second, as with 2004 Res. 5-04A, changes in multiple articles reflecting a single thematic change may also be considered a single change. 125. Reductions in Force (09-2567) In an e-mailed letter dated October 19, 2009, a Dispute Resolution Panel submitted the following request for an opinion. 82