# LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters Minutes_St. Louis Missouri_October 21 22 2002_S1 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) MINUTES COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS LCMS International Center October 21-22, 2002 69. Call to Order Chairman Walter Tesch called the meeting to order and called on Albert Marcis to open the meeting with prayer. All members of the Commission were present. A vacancy continues to exist due to the death of Reverend Norman Sincebaugh. 70. Questions re CUS Board and Boards of Regents Authority (02-2270) The Executive Director of the Board for Higher Education, in a May 22, 2002 memorandum, asked for clarification regarding “the meaning and limits of authority of the BHE/CUS Board as the ‘governing board’ of higher education, further stating that this question is critical since “the relationship between the BHE/CUS Board and the Board of Regents will determine the future of accreditation for Synod’s institutions of higher education.” Question 1: “Bylaw 3.401 identifies the BHE/CUS Board as the ‘governing board of the Concordia University System.’ What does this mean? What authority and limits of authority does the BHE/CUS Board have in respect to the oversight of the Concordia institutions?” Opinion: Bylaw 3.401 a identifies the Board for Higher Education, a program board of the Synod, as “the Board of Directors of the Concordia University System.” Bylaw 3.401 b provides that this board “has authority with respect to the Synod’s colleges and universities” and “to all the Synod’s institutions of higher education, including its seminaries.” The Synod has outlined the “overall responsibility” of the board in Bylaw 3.409, thereby establishing its authority to supervise and coordinate the activities of the Synod’s colleges, universities, and seminaries “as a unified system through their respective boards of regents.” Bylaw 3.409 also establishes limits to its authority by detailing the functions of the board “in keeping with the objectives and the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the Synod.” Question 2: “Bylaw 3.401 b identifies the BHE/CUS Board as having ‘authority with respect to all the Synod’s institutions of higher education, including its seminaries.’ What does this mean? What authority and limits of authority does the BHE/CUS Board have in respect to the oversight of the institutions of higher education?” Opinion: Bylaw 3.401 b identifies the Board for Higher Education as having “authority with respect to all the Synod’s institutions of higher education, including its seminaries.” Bylaw 3.51 k defines such supervision as “to have authority over, to direct actions, to control activities” as to the unified synodical system. Therefore, the board has overall responsibility and the authority to direct actions and control activities to the extent provided by Bylaw 3.409. However, the board must respect the duties that have been expressly given to the boards of regents of each institution of higher education as delineated in Bylaw 6.03. Question 3: “Bylaw 6.01 notes that ‘each college, university, and seminary of the Synod shall be governed, subject to the general policies set by the Synod, by a Board of Regents.’ What does this mean? What authority and limits of authority does the Board of Regents have in respect [to] the governance of the respective institution?”