# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1911_S189 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 13th Delegate Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States, 1911. 189 "We take the liberty, first, of recommending to the Synod that it decline to answer this question, for the following reasons: a. Answering this question involves a number of purely political matters that do not belong before the forum of the Synod. b. Insofar as God's Word and our Christian faith come into consideration here, we believe it would take a great deal of time to lay out clearly and precisely the principles of the Socialist Party in question here and to examine them in the light of God's Word, which would nevertheless have to be done in order to put every member of the Synod in a position to render a competent judgment on this question. "Since the questioner gives as a reason for submitting his question to the Synod that it has been publicly said and written that 'a Christian cannot be a Socialist,' we recommend, second, that the Synod advise him to get in touch with these brethren, as well as with his conference, in order to discuss the matter with them further in a brotherly way. "Then, third, we would like to recommend to the Synod that it express the wish that socialism and what is connected with it continue, as before, to be discussed as needed in our periodicals and examined in the light of God's Word, since this phenomenon of the times is coming ever more to the fore." This committee report was adopted. The Deaconess Matter. Committee No. 19 also had before it the memorial [Eingabe] found on page 131f. of the printed memorials, concerning the "establishment of a Lutheran deaconess home." This memorial informed the Synod that the "Conference of the Hospital, Children's Friend, and City Mission Societies at Red Wing, Minn." had resolved to establish a deaconess home. The plan for such a home is briefly set forth, along with the assurance that everything would be conducted in the right spirit and in accordance with the Word of God, and the reasons are also given that speak for establishing the deaconess institution [*Diakonissenwesen*, the office of deaconess] in our Synod. To be sure, the memorial itself did not state why the matter was being submitted to the Synod; it contained no questions or requests at all; "however," as the committee reported, "Pastor Herzberger informed us, in response to our inquiry, that it is not the conference's desire to obtain any financial help from the Synod, either now or later, but only that the Synod express itself on this matter, new among us, and possibly approve and endorse it. "We take the liberty of making the following recommendations to the Synod: "1. The Synod should not itself take the deaconess institution in hand.