# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1911_S79 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 13th Delegate Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States, 1911. 79 2. to reimburse the $293.15 advanced for Director Brohm's move; 3. to express the synod's thanks to teacher H. G. Röcker for his selfless service in giving instruction in singing. Pro-Gymnasium at Portland, Oreg. The Oregon and Washington District, to which this pro-gymnasium belongs, had submitted the following memorial to the Reverend Synod: The Oregon and Washington District of our synod takes the liberty of submitting the following memorial to a Reverend Delegate Synod, assembled at St. Louis, Mo., for its kind and thorough examination and resolution. Already in 1903, on the occasion of the district's synodical meeting, the question was discussed whether it would not be fitting and advisable to open a pro-gymnasium of our own in our district, since experience had shown that a good many young men failed to enter the service of the Church because the distances to the already existing institutions were so very great. At that time, however, no resolution of any kind was reached. But when, at the next district synodical meeting in 1904, this matter again came before the synod for discussion, the Reverend Vice-President of the General Synod, P. P. Brand, informed the district that the sister district, the Reverend California and Nevada District, had likewise taken up the same question and had also resolved to found a preparatory institution on this coast and to take the steps necessary for it. The Oregon and Washington District likewise appointed a committee for further deliberation on this matter. (Report 1904, p. 121.) Through the negotiations of the committees of these two sister districts, however, it then became clear that the Reverend California and Nevada District had in view the founding of an institution of its own in its own midst, which would provide no relief for our district, since, for example, the distances from Portland, Oreg., to San Francisco, Cal., were about the same as from Portland, Oreg., to St. Paul, Minn. The district conference of the Oregon and Washington District then further discussed the matter for its own district, and it was resolved to seek the advice of the Reverend General President of the synod in this matter. This was done, and he wrote, under date of December 6, 1904: "My personal opinion is that the Pacific districts should from the outset plan for two institutions. For a single institution you live much too far apart. Both districts will also develop more quickly as churches if each has an institution in its own midst. An institution brings new church life and inner cohesion into a district." So then, on February 1, 1905, a circular letter was sent to all