# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1902_S80 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 80 Proceedings of the 25th General, or ...already the case in many places, where German pastors serve English speakers in their own language. And so, once again, one would be forced into a waste of manpower and money, having to place and maintain two workers where one could and should do the work. — For another, such preachers would not be able to make use of the rich theological literature of the German Lutheran Church. Under such circumstances, Chapter I, § 2 of the constitution, concerning the fitting use of the gifts, would again fail to come into its own. Here too, then, the advantage of a bilingual synod is evident. "d. Chapter II, § 6 of the constitution names, among other things, as a condition of membership in the Synod: 'providing the children in the congregation with Christian school instruction.' — In a synodical separation of those becoming English from the Germans lies a danger for the institution of the parochial school, as well as for other good arrangements (catechism classes, church hymn tunes, etc.) that have long since gained full standing in the German synod. The inclination toward innovation present in our age can, once congregations are detached from the old mother synod, quite easily lead to the old good traditions being set aside. "Even now we already have in our German congregations an element that does not recognize the necessity and great benefit of Christian parochial schools. It consists in part of those who themselves attended the parochial school only briefly or not at all. But it is precisely these who are the first to incline toward becoming English. They would therefore be relatively numerous in the English congregations and could quite easily hinder the establishment and maintenance of a parochial school there. This would soon endanger the survival of the parochial school in the neighboring German congregation as well. Since maintaining a school requires sacrifice, people would soon say: If the English can be good Lutherans without a Christian school, why can't we be too? Why must we bear this burden? But once our congregations come to feel the upkeep of their school as a yoke imposed on them, they will also think of shaking it off. How incalculably great, then, is the advantage if this danger can be forestalled! "e. With a close synodical union, etc., this danger too would be avoided: that in jealous pursuit of separate interests on the part of both the Germans and the English, the main thing — namely the furthering of the Kingdom of God — would be lost sight of, a liberal practice introduced, and the unity of the Spirit destroyed. "f. Finally, one more point. We already now have, especially in our mission fields, a considerable number of parishes made up of both German and English congregations, and parishes of this kind will