# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1860_S76 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — 76 — Since it emerged, in discussing the above proposals, that the teachers at our institutions had until now been so meagerly paid that almost all of them had to draw on their own resources, struggle with worries over food, and even go into debt, so that a salary increase for them is unavoidably necessary, many voices rose in favor of the increase. Following a special appeal, many of the delegates also declared that they not only approved the salary increase but would work in their congregations so that contributions toward teachers' salaries would flow more generously than before. The synod then proceeded to a vote, which resulted in the unanimous resolution that the committee's proposals be adopted unchanged, with the addition that the salary of the General President also be raised, namely to $1000. Individual Rulings of the Synod in Particular Cases Brought Before It 1. The question arose whether Prof. Walther still belonged to the electoral college, since his name could not be found among its members in the last general synodical report. This question was settled simply by producing the handwritten minutes of 1857, in which Professor Walther is listed by name among the members of the college; since, therefore, his name can only have been omitted from the printed report by an oversight, the synod declared by unanimous resolution that Professor Walther still belongs to the electoral college as before. 2. President Schaller brought a charge against Pastor A. Lange of Lafayette Co., Mo. The matter was as follows: Pastor Lange had received a former member of the present congregation of Pastor Biltz — a person who had renounced his pastor and had himself been excluded from his congregation — and had admitted him to Holy Communion, without conferring with that congregation's former pastor; he was therefore charged before the district president. The latter, the General President, and Professor Walther as well, did everything possible to help set Pastor Lange right again, but received from him only contemptuous and defiant answers. Invited by President Schaller to attend the synod so his case could be settled, he declared that he would have nothing to do with the synod until the question he had posed — whether renouncing one's pastor and congregation is a renouncing of God and Christ and a handing-over to Satan — was answered either with a simple yes or a simple no; indeed he repeatedly declared it impossible for him to remain a member of the synod unless the question he had posed were answered to his own mind and will. After careful consideration of all the circumstances, the synod found itself compelled to resolve that Pastor Lange be reprimanded by letter for his arrogance and insolence, and be informed that, under