# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1857_S368 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — 368 — Censure of the Negligence of Many Congregations in Contributing to the Synod's Needs. The Synod found itself compelled to censure seriously the negligence and sluggishness of many congregations in contributing to the needs of the Synod in general, and of our two educational institutions in particular. It was repeatedly observed that the fault certainly also lay in part with the pastors concerned, in that they had not urged and guided their congregations to this earnestly and diligently enough. Several deputies declared that they, too, recognized it as their duty to support their pastors in exhorting their congregations, so that matters might improve. One of them thought that the congregations probably did not know how great the need was, and that they should therefore be better acquainted with the actual need. The president replied that, given the many and varied needs, the sum of what was required could not be determined so precisely. But whoever has the Church's welfare at heart can well know and learn how great the want is everywhere. It was a disgrace, he said, how little some congregations contributed. While some congregations did almost beyond their means, others were mired in rank stinginess and showed an irresponsible indifference to the Church's welfare and prosperity. This great ingratitude of theirs toward the Word and Sacrament offered them so abundantly, purely, and undiluted, God would surely punish by withdrawing the same from them again, should they not repent in time. The congregations should consider: whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly; but whoever sows in blessing will also reap in blessing. One of the deliberating pastors complained how hard it was, especially for a pastor whose congregation had not joined the Synod — and indeed had not joined precisely for that reason, so as not to be obligated to contribute to the Synod's needs — nevertheless to hold that congregation earnestly to doing so. He was answered: such a congregation deserves no pastor from our Synod at all. But people also have to be guided toward this and accustomed to giving. The pastor need only not shrink from the effort of drawing his people's attention to this matter individually, particularly in their own homes, and encouraging them to give. This will not remain without fruit. Of course, it must always be kept in mind that this is not a matter of gold and silver — of that the Lord has enough, and enough ways besides to provide us with as much as we need — but of the fruit of the Gospel. Whatever the Gospel does not produce, and whatever does not grow from the root of a faith active in love, is worth less than nothing to the Synod. On the repeated observation that it would be good if, from time to time, an overview of the need were published, since this would remind the congregations of the large and manifold needs that exist and exhort them to more diligent and generous giving — reference being also made to a similar wish and resolution of the Middle District Synod (see the 2nd synodical report of the Middle District, p. 28) — the Synod resolved that its general treasurer be requested to publish, semi-annually or at least once a year, a tabular overview of the general synodical treasury's needs, taking the mission's needs into account as well, as a supplement to "Der Lutheraner."