# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1853_S251 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — 251 — If two Christians quarrel with one another over property — mine and yours — should we not admonish them, according to 1 Corinthians 6, to a Christian reconciliation? Suppose they had struck and insulted one another, because the one owed the other something, and the other, whom the first would not deal justly with, had taken something from him by force through unchristian self-help. Must we not admonish them: dear brothers, be reconciled. You who took what belonged to your brother through unchristian self-help, give it back; ask each other's forgiveness for all injuries, and forgive one another; but as for the actual original quarrel — who was in the right — either unite among yourselves alone in brotherly love, once the gross and open wrong of the unchristian self-help and the striking and scolding has been dealt with; or, if you cannot agree on the dispute itself, then, as reconciled Christians, choose Christian arbitrators to settle your dispute, and promise one another, in love and reconciliation, that whatever they decide about the disputed matter according to their Christian judgment shall stand between you. So too the open, unchristian self-help of our sectarians, and of those who have encouraged them in their self-appointed separation from their church, must first be dealt with; then all wrongs must be mutually forgiven and forgotten, our apostate church members admonished to reconciliation and referred to their own church court. And finally, the doctrinal dispute between the two synods can then, once the public, undeniable, unchristian self-help and encroachment upon our office has been dealt with, be carried on after Christian reconciliation, in Christian love, without further insult and hatred, both in writing and in speech. The bond of peace will open the way to the possibility of unity in the Spirit. In this way a theological dispute can be carried on without giving offense or spiritual harm to our church members, and other Christian Lutheran synods and faculties, deserving the trust of both parties, may also be consulted. To this Christian reconciliation we admonish you, for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ. The wholesome benefit will be: 1. A Christian reconciliation. 2. The removal of the great scandal before the Church and the world. 3. The rescue of the erring souls of our apostate church members, so far as it is possible for a Reverend Synod of Missouri to contribute to this. 4. The Synod of Missouri will then be free of the responsibility and no longer guilty of their blood, once it has itself, in penitence, shown them the right way as well. 5. The hoped-for goal: the unity of the Spirit that then becomes possible, in a doctrinal dispute conducted with a heart reconciled in Christian love and finally brought to an end. Against this stands the harm, if the Reverend Synod of Missouri should also despise this Christian admonition and make itself further a partaker in the dreadful sin of factionalism: 1. Injury to the conscience, which will awaken in its own time. 2. The great responsibility for the continuing scandal and accumulated blood-guilt. 3. Breach of its own synodical resolution to leave nothing undone that can serve the peace of the Church.