# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1851_S171 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — 171 — belong through him to the true Church, which no one knows except God alone. By synecdoche, that is, by that figure of speech in which the part is put for the whole, one also calls a whole congregation, in which the Word of God is preached purely, a true, orthodox church; this nevertheless always remains a figurative way of speaking. But if one did not call it so, one would be denying the true congregation of the saints that lies hidden within it. Where, on the other hand, the Word of God is obscured and falsified by various errors, such a visible community cannot be called the true, orthodox church — although it cannot be denied that the true Church lies hidden even among sects and factions, even under the Roman Antichrist, so far as at least the text of Scripture and of holy baptism still remains among them, from which true children of God can be born. Only among those who essentially deny, blaspheme, and persecute the Word and sacrament is no Church of God any longer hidden. The Church — that is, the truly believing and sanctified children of God — must therefore be sought not preferentially in one particular church, but in the entirety of those who are called. Although we ascribe to our Lutheran Church, with full right, the glorious distinction of being the church of the pure Word and sacrament, and although we must therefore make it every person's duty, for the sake of his salvation, to seek her fellowship and hold to her: we must not, for all that, presume to assert that we find the Church exclusively in her alone — indeed we must condemn it as an error if someone held to the Lutheran Church only because he believed he could find the congregation of the true saints in her alone. Those who regard the Lutheran Church as one that has constituted itself a separate church precisely because it sees no church outside itself in fact turn it into a sect. Just as it never occurred to Luther to separate himself from the true Church hidden under the papacy, so too it must never occur to a true Lutheran, through his adherence to the Lutheran Church, to cut himself off from those who are illuminated by the light of true faith, in whatever ecclesiastical communions they may lie hidden or, so to speak, held captive. Our fathers, the confessors of the Book of Concord, silence not only the particularist Lutherans of the present day but also their opponents — those who cry out as "exclusive" everything that insists on a closed and decided confession — when, in their preface, they so solemnly and earnestly protest that their condemnations are meant to apply not to those who err out of simplicity and do not blaspheme the truth of the divine Word, still less to whole churches, but solely to the false and seductive doctrines and their stubborn teachers and blasphemers. Their example can thus teach how un-Lutheran the itch to condemn is. This led to a discussion of the concept of "heretic." Only he can be regarded as such who has judged himself (Titus 3:10) — that is, whose conscience has been so convicted and overcome by a clear, sunlit presentation of the truth that it must say to him: you are dishonest and will neither hear nor tolerate the truth; and who at the same time seeks to spread his error and gather a following for it. It is thus by no means the case that every erring teacher is at once to be branded a heretic. On the occasion of the fourth thesis, that the congregation of believers and saints is the true possessor and bearer of all heavenly goods, rights, offices, and powers, a lively discussion arose