# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1847_S9 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) — 9 — in which he asked the synod to send him a commission to examine him and grant him ecclesiastical ordination. After due inquiry into the petitioner's qualifications, the secretary was instructed to write to him that the synod could not grant his request, because it found nothing in him that recommended him for the holy preaching office, but rather had learned several things that made him unfit for it — that the synod, however, left it open to him to recommend himself through better documentation, and, as the case may be, to clear himself of certain accusations made against him. Finally, an important letter from Pastor E. Leonhardt of Lancaster, Ohio, became the subject of long, careful deliberation. In this letter he requested and gave grounds, first and chiefly, for an amendment to Section 10 of Chapter IV and Section 14 of Chapter V of the constitution. In the wide-ranging and repeated discussion of this subject it became clear that the synod did indeed wish for a certain uniformity and agreement in outward worship within the synodical district, yet without regarding this uniformity of ceremonies — as that Section 10 itself states — as necessary to the true unity of the church, or wishing thereby to infringe in the least on Christian liberty. IV. Proceedings of Thursday, April 29. The deliberation over the amendment to Section 10 of Chapter IV, etc., proposed by Pastor E. Leonhardt, was continued today, and his many remarks were duly weighed. After various proposals, the following addition to that section was finally adopted: "When the synod, under Chapter IV, Section 10 of its constitution, makes it part of its business to strive for the greatest possible uniformity in ceremonies, it does not proceed on the assumption — as Section 14 of Chapter V states — that such uniformity is necessary to the essence of the true church; rather, it regards such uniformity merely as beneficial, especially given the circumstances in which our church presently finds itself here. The synod also intends that in introducing any ceremony no compulsion whatsoever be applied, but that, after thorough prior instruction of the conscience, everything be left to the Christian liberty of the congregations concerned." The remainder of that letter was then also read aloud. Regarding Pastor Leonhardt's remarks on Chapter VI A, Section 7, the synod declared that it did not share his misgivings about the call [*Beruf*] and about the presumption of the synod's Präses [president] acting as visitor — for reasons set out in more detail during the discussion of this subject. It decided, however, that the provision should remain provisional by which the Präses, during his three-year term of office, is to take care, either in person or through the vice-president, to visit all congregations of the synodical district. A further addition proposed by Pastor Leonhardt concerning ordination found no support, because the matter itself is already contained in the constitution. His complaint about the fixing of the time and place of this year's synodical assembly did not convince the synod that anything had been done there contrary to Christian love. His grievance