# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_2023_S234 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) DELEGATE RESOLUTIONS WHEREAS, In our life as Synod, a fully functional, transparent, synodwide conversation on each key issue of life or doctrine is required to actually foster this common mind and consensus, especially where there is controversy; and WHEREAS, Every year that passes without such a standing conversation simply means more time in which new issues, conflicts, and grievances emerge and fester; and WHEREAS, Full guidance into all the truth through the work of the Spirit in the Body of Christ (John 16:3), as well as unity with each other leading into and out of our conventions, would be greatly benefited by such a process; and WHEREAS, Such a standing conversation should bring together circuits, districts, seminaries, the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR), the Praesidium, and the Council of Presidents (COP), and also connect as far as possible with all pastors, commissioned workers, and laity; and WHEREAS, The Koinonia Project already contains the seeds of such a standing network, namely, 1) several smaller groups who already have met voluntarily—including the COP, who are the key bridge from circuits to district and districts to Synod; and 2) the recognition that technology could be used to further connect these and other essential in-person gatherings, both to each other and to the wider Synod; and 234 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION WHEREAS, The seminaries, CTCR, and Praesidium likewise already play critical roles in shaping our common mind and synodwide connections; and WHEREAS, The Chief Financial Officer of Synod reported that the identical process originally discussed in an amendment to Resolution 4-01 on Sunday, July 30, 2023, would have no additional financial cost if referred to the bodies named above for implementation; therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod in convention request that the COP, CTCR, seminaries, and Praesidium grow their existing connections into such a standing process as soon as humanly possible. Adam Clark Pastoral Delegate, Indiana District Action: Declined (9) The resolution was moved and seconded with “direct” in the final resolve replaced with “request that.” After some discussion, closure of debate was carried and the resolution failed of adoption [Yes: 180; No: 520]. Resolutions