# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2013_S308 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 308 OPINIONS OF COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS same Synod-established procedures to discipline them…In summary, all Synod members, including organizations of Synod members, must follow the Synod’s bylaws regarding dissent, dispute resolution, and ecclesiastical supervision. To do otherwise invites the member’s/ members’ ecclesiastical supervisor(s) to use those same Synod-established procedures to discipline them” (CCM Opinion 11-2589). Thus, fellowship with one another in the Synod is not a selective fellowship. And the fellowship of the Synod is not a cafeteria where members can pick and choose, i.e., take what they want and leave the rest or serve themselves. The nature of fellowship with one another in the Synod is not marked by selective appropriation or elimination of certain constitutional and bylaw provisions and resolutions—much less the confessional basis, confessional position(s), and objectives of the Synod. As reflected in the Synod’s Constitution, Bylaws and resolutions throughout its history, the members of the Synod are in fellowship with one another. For a further relevant treatment of the matter, the commission calls attention to the entire CCM Opinions 05-2443, 05-2444, and 11-2589. (Adopted Nov. 11–13, 2011) Authority of a District President (11-2616) In a letter dated September 17, 2011, a pastor member of the Synod submitted a series of questions for response by the commission. Additional supplemental information was received on September 27. [NOTE: In carrying out its duties, the commission is required by Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (b) to notify an officer or agency of the Synod, including the district president involved in this matter, if a request for an opinion involves an activity of that officer or agency, and to allow that officer or agency the opportunity to submit in writing information regarding the matter(s) at issue. While the commission is not a finder of facts and must rely on the information provided to it in questions submitted, the additional background information contemplated by Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (b) can often assist in understanding and responding to the questions presented.] Question 1: In light of Article VII of the LCMS Constitution and 4.4.6 of the LCMS Bylaws and the Synod’s recent action declaring that the LCMS Constitution takes precedence over LCMS Bylaws, under what circumstances, if any, may a District President write a letter on District letterhead, using a congregation’s membership directory in his possession to mail said letter directly to the individual members of the congregation for the purpose of calling a Voters Assembly? Opinion: The duties, responsibilities, and authority of a district president do not include the unilateral authority to call a business meeting of a congregation’s voters’ assembly. He does, however, have authority to assist a congregation as it may request, and the duty, responsibility, and authority to inquire as to the prevailing spiritual conditions of a congregation, as directed in Bylaw 4.4.5,8 and may arrange and conduct official visits or investigations as described in Bylaw 4.4.6. Article VII of Constitution reads as follows: Article VII Relation of the Synod to Its Members 1. In its relation to its members the Synod is not an ecclesiastical government exercising legislative or coercive powers, and with respect to the individual congregation’s right of self-government it is but an advisory body. Accordingly, no resolution of the Synod imposing anything upon the individual congregation is of binding force if it is not in accordance with the Word of God or if it appears to be inexpedient as far as the condition of a congregation is concerned. 2013 Convention Workbook 2. Membership of a congregation in the Synod gives the Synod no equity in the property of the congregation. Bylaw 4.4.6 reads as follows: 4.4.6 The district president, even without formal request therefor, may through the proper channels arrange for an official visit or investigation when a controversy arises in a congregation or between two or more congregations of the district or when there is evidence of a continuing unresolved problem in doctrine or practice. (a) He shall ask for a full report on the case in order that he may have a clear understanding of the situation. (b) If he authorizes anyone to represent him in such matters, his representative shall be accorded the same rights as the district president. The responsibilities of a district president in this regard flow not only from the Bylaws, but also Article XII 7 of the Constitution: The district presidents shall, moreover, especially exercise supervision over the doctrine, life, and administration of office of the ordained and commissioned ministers of their district and acquaint themselves with the religious conditions of the congregations of their district. To this end, they shall visit and, according as they deem it necessary, hold investigations in the congregations. Their assistants in this work are the circuit counselors, who therefore shall regularly make their reports to the district president. In conducting an official visit or investigation, a district president or his representative may arrange for such meetings with a pastor, the leadership of a congregation, groups within a congregation, or the congregation itself as he deems necessary. Even such a meeting with the entire congregation, however, cannot properly be characterized as the calling of the voters’ assembly unless the congregation itself chooses to convene such a meeting as part of its response to such visit or investigation. Separate and apart from any such official visit or investigation, pastors and/or congregations often call upon a district president for guidance, assistance, and support in the conduct of their spiritual and other affairs. Where called upon by the recognized leaders of a congregation to do so, a district president might well use his letterhead and a membership list supplied by the congregational leaders to assist the congregation’s leaders in publicizing a voters’ assembly business meeting authorized and called by the congregation’s leaders as provided in the governing documents of that congregation, and at the congregation’s invitation, use such a meeting to carry out the responsibilities described in Bylaws 4.4.5 and 4.4.6. Nothing in the Constitution or Bylaws of the Synod prohibit the providing of such assistance upon request. In fact, they encourage such support and assistance when appropriate. As described in recent CCM Opinion 10-2581, there may be times when internal disagreement in a congregation results in the need for a district president, by specific provision in a congregation’s governing documents or the absence of having been provided some other internal dispute resolution, to be involved in the resolution of a congregation’s internal disputes.9 In carrying out his responsibilities in such a circumstance, and in assisting the congregation’s leaders in the conduct of their own affairs, a district president might be even more inclined to allow the use of district letterhead and the resources of the district office in the scheduling and coordination of a voters’ assembly called by the leaders of the congregation itself. However, it should not be construed that the district president himself is calling a meeting of the voters’ assembly of the congregation for the purpose of conducting congregational business but the congregation itself in accordance with its own governing documents. While a district president may not call a meeting of the voters’ assembly of a congregation, he or his designee may be present at such meeting for the purposes of carrying out the district president’s