# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2013_S445
# Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration)

0
2
5
7

Disagree

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

3

7

1

2

0

2010

0

9

8

1

1

0

2011

6

0
0
13
1

Disagree

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

1

10

1

1

0

3

13

2

1

0

6

Strongly Agree

2

Neither Disagree Nor Agree
6

0

Disagree

Agree

0

Strongly Disagree

4

2

6

1

0

9

6

2

2

0

5. The SMP program is meeting the needs for which it was designed.
Response
2009
2010
2011

0

Strongly Disagree

4. The schedule for course offerings throughout the year is reasonable.
Response
2009
2010
2011

0

2009

4

Strongly Disagree

3. I am sufficiently informed on SMP.
Response

Strongly Agree

88

2
3
7
2

Disagree
Neither Disagree Nor Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

0

5

3

3

2

2010

0

8

7

4

0

2011

0

0

3

8

2

4

6

2

1

0

9. I would recommend enrolling in the SMP program to someone
contemplating it.

6

7

Agree
Strongly Agree

1

0

Disagree
Neither Disagree Nor Agree

0

Strongly Disagree

8. Thus far, I have a positive overall reaction to the SMP program.
Response
2009
2010

1

Strongly Agree

6

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

1

5

Disagree

Agree

1

Strongly Disagree

8

7

1

3

0

2011

0

0

3

14

2

7. The expectations of students in the SMP program are unrealistically high.
Response
2009
2010
2011

0

Strongly Disagree

6. The tuition cost for the courses is appropriate.
Response
2009

Specific Ministry Pastor (SMP) Task Force
445

2013 Convention Workbook

89